by DAVID FLINT – IT IS a truth universally acknowledged that in the tradition expressed in the question famously asked by the Roman magistrate, Lucius Cassius, “Cui bono?” (who benefits from this?) we should “follow the money”.
The answers would explain the Albanese government’s curious and disjointed program which should mean a jam-packed federal corruption commission agenda. They also explain President Biden’s weakness in the face of Beijing’s spy balloon.
- Western politicians assume voters are stupid and do not notice they only approve “renewables” that benefit Beijing.
- Why else then do they reject nuclear and hydro? Because China has “advised” them to?
- That their interests lie elsewhere can be seen in the fact that core government functions are now so mismanaged.
With all this, the mainstream Australian media are still according to Mr Albanese the honeymoon they denied to the Howard, Abbott and Thatcher governments as well as the Trump administration.
A rare unpaid politician, Mr Trump has just proposed what few leaders would have the courage, common sense and love of country to do, walk out of the Paris Accord.
FRAUD
Now a simple test for global warming policy is to follow the money. So who benefits from government policy based wholly on what our greatest living geologist, Ian Plimer, declares is the “biggest scientific fraud in history”?
The beneficiaries are the murderous, multi-billionaire thugs who have long enjoyed a stranglehold over China, sharing the loot with their Western accessories and mouthpieces.
Not only are net-zero and other catch-phrases and formulae part of this fraud. So-called “renewable energy”, at least authorised renewable energy, is unreliable, environmentally damaging, often exploitative and enriching for Beijing’s billionaire thugs.
Supportive Western politicians assume the population is stupid and do not notice they only approve “renewables” which benefit Beijing: wind and solar.
Why do they reject nuclear and hydro? People will increasingly demand why the Albanese government is not taking decisions in favour of Australian households, rather than Beijing who is clearly never going to reduce her emissions.
As for those who cling to the belief that the 21st century will be Beijing’s, it is well worth noting that the most authoritative Washington-based political strategist who speaks to many of the world’s chancelleries, Australian Gregory Copley, has long been warning, with strong factual support, of the coming collapse of the Peoples’ Republic of China.
The latest may be found in his 36th book, Sovereignty in the 21st Century.
We should also not forget that the Western politician credited with making the Beijing communists acceptable in Western circles after the Tiananmen Square massacre – and extremely well paid to do so – was Bob Hawke.
At home, he too was strongly opposed to nuclear and hydro. He also presided over electoral “reform” – in effect, opening elections to significantly increased fraud.
It has been obvious that something is wrong among many if not most Western politicians and especially Australia’s.
This can be seen in the fact that core government functions are so mismanaged, from education, defence, energy, and finance yet with the politicians always in search of new fields of endeavour such as the Voice and that old chestnut, some politicians’ republic to replace our crowned republic.
Take the great Rudd initiative, the NBN, which was to be so successful that it would be sold off to the private sector at a massive profit.
The fact that recently $39 billion has been written off has been downplayed, a scandal barely mentioned in the media.
Surely off-budget allocations should be unconstitutional and ministers personally responsible for gross misfeasance in public office?
Why is there such incompetence in matters which are both fundamental and elementary?
REMEMBER
Older Australians can remember when almost all members of classes of boys leaving primary school were literate, numerate, well-informed and well-disciplined.
The answer to the revelation that a third are now illiterate and innumerate is to tinker with the Naplan assessment to ensure failure is never reported and comparison impossible.
That was not the work alone of the Albanese government, every education minister, ALP and Coalition, signed off on this, yet another, national suicide note.
As always, the aim is to keep us in the dark.
At least in relation to the Voice referendum, opposition leader Dutton has forced the Albanese Government to allow some truths to seep through so that some of the facts people need before they vote might be available.
Despite soft polling, apparatchiks have probably warned the government that electoral fraud has a reduced impact in a referendum.
This dawned on me during the republic referendum, which I am happy to explain.
That said, there will still be the possibility and consequently the commission of fraud in the Voice referendum. As there will be in any subsequent republic referendum, if the government is silly enough to push something which has been shown to be hopeless.
While referendum fraud will be less effective than it is in elections, it remains an elementary truth that if fraud is possible, it will occur.
So much for the cui bono principle in our nation. It also applies in the empire.
When this was centred on London, the behaviour of the emperor or empress had to be impeccable.
If there were any deviation from this, abdication followed, as with Edward VIII whose departure was demanded most strongly by the Australian PM, Joe Lyons.
POWER
The real power in the British Empire, at least from just before Victoria, was distributed through the Westminster system to the cabinet government in London, later shared with Dominion cabinets.
When the empire inevitably moved to Washington, real executive power descended exclusively to one person, the President, an emperor more powerful and in his term more irremovable than any Stuart king. When he was Ronald Reagan or Donald Trump, it worked superbly.
However, when he is not only a long-suspected Manchurian candidate with an increasing mountain of evidence against him, but also in serious cognitive decline and the most deservedly impeachable president in living memory with no impeachment attempted, we can only conclude that something is rotten in the District of Columbia.
As Senator Marsha Blackburn said on the Balloon, “the Chinese Communist Party would never have done something like this with President Donald Trump. … maybe Biden Incorporated, is still doing business with them.” PC
Thank you Professor Flint. All well catalogued domestic symptoms of today’s “free world” nations in decline. Systematically demoralised over decades by enemies within and without.
As many now see, “dogs” have been put in charge of everything. This is how America’s most experienced living combat correspondent, and otherwise analyst, foreign correspondent and author, Michael Yon explains it:
“Dog kings, dog presidents, dog prime ministers, secretaries, directors … please make your own lists.
“This is an old demoralisation strategem. Or strategy. Depending on how you perceive it.
“All held sacred will be dogged upon. Unless you stop it. Nobody will ride in to save the day. Only you. And I.
“Those who took the knee are slaves. Slaves to The Beast.”
So here we are. Our diplomatic embrace of corporate globalist stakeholderism has moved us to the “normalisation” phase of nutty Climate/Pandemic Emergency Governance (more correctly kakistocracy): code for mass genocide and slavery . Then, onward to their surreal AI world of transhumans and technocrat despots who they believe will outlive today’s Henry Kissingers and Claus Schwabs by centuries.
Compliance is no longer an option!
Excellent piece Mr. Flint, as always.
Have you ever considered doing research into the results of what you have written. E.g., suicides, joblessness because of the education system, hopelessness, lack of ambition felt by so many. Some things may not be attributable to the subjects you mentioned but I think one way or another they do,