Morrison’s duty is to Australia – not the planet

SOME Australians are more worried about net-zero climate policies than defending our freedom and sovereignty, ironically against the largest polluter the world has ever known. 

And some Australians are profiting from pushing climate policies. 

Pretending to save the planet is dangerous when Australia is under direct threat from the most powerful authoritarian military the world has ever seen.
Lincoln Parker
Chair, Defence & National Security Policy Branch – Liberal Party

At no time since World War II has Australia, the Indo-Pacific, and the free world been at more risk than we are now.

China is engaged in the most significant and most rapid expansion of military power in “peacetime” history, with the world’s largest navy and army, coupled with a formidable missile and air force.

DOMINANCE

In his recent Lowy Institute report Australia and the Growing Reach of China’s Military, Thomas Shugart noted: “Based on its scope, scale and the specific capabilities being developed, this build-up appears to be designed to, first, threaten the United States with ejection from the western Pacific, and then to achieve dominance in the Indo-Pacific.”

There will be no democracy to defend and pass on to our children if we don’t wake up and address the immediate danger, and that’s not climate change.

With all care and no responsibility, weakening Australia is precisely what Simon Holmes à Court, senior advisor to Melbourne University’s Energy Transition Hub, supports with his Climate 200 group.

The group has raised millions to fund the anti-AUKUS Greens Party and independent candidates like Zali Stegall.

But instead of supporting Australia, speaking out positively for initiatives like AUKUS, the defence of Taiwan and Australian security, Holmes à Court and people like him are criticising the government’s net-zero plan.

“We’re talking about it because Morrison is about to go to Glasgow with nothing more than Tony Abbott’s warmed-up homework from 2015. We’re going to be an absolute embarrassment when we get there,” Holmes à Court said on ABC Q&A.

But where was Holmes à Court when China built and militarised seven artificial islands in international waters, causing immense environmental damage to the marine ecosystem?

Unsurprisingly, according to research provider BloombergNEF, China dominates the lithium-ion battery supply chain.

China’s success results from its sizeable domestic battery demand, 72GWh, and control of 80 per cent of the world’s raw material refining, 77 per cent of the world’s cell capacity, and 60 per cent of the world’s component manufacturing.

CRITICAL

The renewable energy business case is reliant upon energy storage, primarily via batteries. But, unfortunately, it’s not always sunny or windy, so generators must store energy, which is where batteries are crucial.

But this also opens Australia up to continued reliance upon other countries, like China, for a critical component fundamental to the operation of our economy.

While Australia is at risk from our largest adversary, the Morrison government is looking to invest in and shore up sovereign control over our supply chains.

But over-reliance on high total cost renewables, electric vehicles and batteries undermines our sovereignty and makes us unnecessarily vulnerable to foreign countries supplying a critical supply chain component.

Prince Charles publicly urged Prime Minister Morrison to attend COP26 in Glasgow, calling it a “last chance saloon” to save the planet.

However, the Australian government’s first priority is the safety and continued sovereignty of our people, in our country, not the planet.

Given the leaders from China, Russia, Japan, Brazil, Iran, Mexico and the Vatican are not attending – Prince Charles, Holmes à Court, The Greens and Zali Steggal ought to be “urging” these leaders to act if they are actually fair dinkum about climate change.

RECKLESS

Weakening Australia’s national security by placing additional costs, new so-called “eco-friendly” methods and systems on our industries while tethering energy storage to foreign-made batteries is reckless and not in our national interest.

Pretending to be doing all of this as a saviour of the environment when you stand to gain financially from changes to government policy is deceptive.

Doing so at a time when Australia is under threat from the largest and most powerful authoritarian military the world has ever seen is dangerous.PC

– Lincoln Parker

MAIN PHOTOGRAPH:  Prince Charles (L) and Scott Morrison. (courtesy news.com.au)
RE-PUBLISHED: This article was originally published by The Epoch Times on November 1, 2021. Re-used with permission.
POLITICOM: PM’s media cover for net-zero back-flip
POLITICOM: Net-zero Barnaby caves to PM & The Greens

3 thoughts on “Morrison’s duty is to Australia – not the planet

  1. Another very good article in the Daily Telegraph written by Vikki Campion (Mrs Joyce).

    It ends with: “Australia led a solid bloc of countries with Japan, Korea, India, Brazil, China and Indonesia to delete extreme pledges from the final communique (COP26), including a timeline on zero coal, signing up to a methane pledge and ceasing fossil fuels.”

    “Even net-zero by 2050 was removed in the end to be in favour of net-zero ‘by or around mid-century’.”

    “But in the end, Australia’s presence was slammed by the climate-Antoinettes, representatives from Hollywood, art galleries, climate renewable energy and environmental groups.”

    “You will never make the climate-Antoinettes happy with any goal or commitment – not even when you are blaming your penis size on climate change.”

  2. Why does the prince of evil have such rosy cheeks?
    Adrenochrome? Perhaps?
    Don’t know

  3. So, today at COP26, India offers 2070 for net-zero. Why are western leaders not questioning the geo political strategic significance of China offering 2060 for net-zero…a full decade after the west is locked into expensive, unreliable renewables? The answer should be clear…China will wil (economic) WW3.

Comments are closed.