These studies reveal mounting evidence that suggests COVID-19 vaccine may work for a while, however, protection is extremely short lived.

A recent Qatar study shows vaccine effectiveness reduces to zero within six months.

FADE

Other studies of vaccine effectiveness show similar fade.

Israeli research has suggested the boosters fade after a mere eight weeks. One headline in January 2022 read, “Fourth vaccine shot not good enough against Omicron”.

Another suggested “minimal protection”. As The Daily Sceptic noted: Fourth Vaccine Dose Makes No Difference, Study From Israel Shows, as Infections and ICU Admissions Surge.

Then there is the latest British research. Boosters do not help and may make things worse for the vaccinated.

Natural immunity offers far, far greater protection against COVID than the vaccines. As does prior infection with COVID.

The scrupulously fair Swiss Doctor reports: “Prior to omicron (ie during the alpha and delta periods), several large studies showed that vaccine protection against symptomatic infection decreased from about 90-95 per cent shortly after vaccination to close to zero per cent within about half a year. This decrease was first seen in Israel during the delta wave in summer 2021.

“Since omicron, vaccine protection against infection starts at 50-60 per cent shortly after vaccination and decreases to zero per cent within 4-6 months. A booster vaccination restores protection to 50-60 per cent, but again only for a short period of time. The lower peak protection is due to the partial immune escape of the omicron variant.”

So, what about protection against severe disease and death, which is at the core of the Australian media’s claims?

Again, here is the Swiss Doctor: “Since omicron, protection against infection starts at 50 per cent and drops to zero within a few months, whereas protection against severe disease and death in senior citizens starts at 75 per cent and decreases to 50 per cent within a few months.”

On this view, there is certainly some protection, but no guarantees, and it wanes dramatically.

You are vaccinated, and still at risk of serious illness and death. Moreover, astonishingly, much of the international data doesn’t break down effectiveness against death by age.

So perhaps many of those vaccinated people who are jabbed, then get COVID, don’t get really sick and die because, well they never were going to, as they were largely young and healthy.

DEATHS

And perhaps the data on vaccinated deaths might have been considerably less favourable had more old people been included in the various studies.

Then there are the studies related to hospitalisations and deaths, both from COVID itself and from adverse reactions to the vaccines. First, there are data on the risk of hospitalisation and death, and they are not reassuring.

For example, country-by-country data showing the relationship between vaccination rates and COVID deaths show a clear pattern.  

Former federal MP Craig Kelly recently shared the following charts [see below]. These clearly highlight what Australia’s media is hiding.

Australia beats all comers on both the highest vaccination rate and the highest number of deaths per million. Ouch.

Some recent NSW hospitalisation figures confirm this. As noted on Craig Kelly’s Telegram page on 11 June 2022, the official NSW weekly figures were as follows:

Admitted to hospital with COVID:
• 50 – who had 4 or more injections
• 184 – 3 injections
• 93 – two injections
• 0 – no injections.

Admitted to Intensive Care Units with COVID:
• 5 – 4 or more injections
• 20 – 3 injections
• 2 – 2 injections
• 0 – no injections.

So, at least in the Premier State that week, it was far better to be unvaccinated if you didn’t want to get very ill with COVID.

US attorney Tom Woods noted in April 2022: “A new Danish study making the rounds will surprise people who have been getting their information from officially approved sources.

“We’ve heard it said again and again that the shots help prevent death from COVID.

“This study seeks to find out just how effective the vaccines have been in preventing death.

“It concludes that the AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson vaccines have had a positive effect in preventing deaths, while the mRNA vaccines (Pfizer and Moderna) have had no effect.”

INTERVAL

Woods quoted the renowned former Harvard medical scholar, Martin Kulldorff. In the case of the mRNA vaccines, says Kulldorff: “There was no evidence of a mortality reduction. For every 100 deaths among the unvaccinated, there are 103 deaths among the vaccinated, with a 95 per cent confidence interval of 63 to 171 deaths. That is, the mRNA vaccines may reduce mortality a little bit, or they may increase it; we do not know.”

“For the mRNA vaccines, there was a reduction in COVID deaths but an increase in cardiovascular deaths, but neither was statistically significant. So, either result could be due to random chance. Alternatively, the vaccines may reduce the risk for COVID deaths while increasing the risk for cardiovascular deaths. We do not know, and Pfizer and Moderna did not design the RCTs to let us know.”

Then there is the question of adverse events from the jab. British Medical Journal editor Will Jones has been examining this. His headline: COVID Vaccines More Likely to Put You in Hospital Than Keep You Out, BMJ Editor’s Analysis of Pfizer and Moderna Trial Data Finds.

The World Health Organisation concurs, as The Daily Expose points out: World Health Organization Study concludes risk of suffering Serious Injury due to COVID Vaccination is 339 per cent higher than risk of being hospitalised with COVID-19.

The list of illnesses and adverse reactions related to the COVID jab runs to many pages. Not just, infamously, myocarditis.