Our nation stands at a crucial juncture as we approach the coming election.
Later this year we will vote to ensure the jackboot of globalism remains firmly on our neck, or we will vote for freedom and rebirth. The choice is that serious.
My hope is that Australians will rediscover the freedom that made us great in the first place. And the greatest freedom is the freedom to be free from the government and its endless regulation and bureaucracy.
The alternative does not bear thinking about.
The challenge, of course, is that too many Australians believe the Liberal Party is the alternative to the Labor Party, when they are nothing of the sort.
The ugly truth is that there is no serious difference between the two major parties. Any hint of difference is a mere illusion.
Trust me. I know these people. For the past three years, I have worked with them, begrudgingly.
Sure they differ around the edges – about how they would implement the same policies, or about how they would sell the same policies to an unsuspecting electorate.
But when you get to the heart of the issues, deep down both the Labor and Liberal Party leadership are peas in a globalist pod.
Don’t believe the media who have convinced you that the battle between Liberal and Labor is a titanic struggle of ideas.
Our political system is less gladiatorial battle than it is Pro Wrestling – a display put on to distract the masses. Bread and circuses.
It’s entertainment. It’s a show. It’s an illusion to make the average man think he has the chance to change things when in fact, he does not.
We are told that if you don’t like Labor you can vote for the Liberals. And if the Liberals mess it up, well then you can swing back to Labor.
The system is designed so that we experience swings but never change, a pendulum but never a revolution.
Think about it. All of this is designed with the intention of quelling dissent and ensuring that the masses never rise up.
Prime Minister Albanese wanted to divide the country with an Indigenous Voice to Parliament. But so did Peter Dutton. The only difference was in how. Prime Minister Albanese wanted it in the Constitution, Mr Dutton promised to implement ‘a local and regional advisory body in legislation, not in the Constitution’. It was a case of same-same but only different around the edges.
Or what about our insane commitment to the Paris Climate Accord? Are we to believe that Prime Minister Albanese and Mr Dutton really think the agreement will change the planet’s weather? Both leaders are blindly committed to it.
Just this week Peter Dutton was scathing in his criticism of the government’s energy policy and in the very next breath he was steadfast, saying that he is committed to the Paris Climate Accord. Both men will bankrupt our country in pursuit of something they know is unreachable and irrelevant.
Should we talk about Digital ID? Labor is currently taking heat for the idea, but Digital ID is a policy that originated with the Liberal Party.
And don’t get me started on the Misinformation and Disinformation Bill. Anyone who thinks Peter Dutton wouldn’t love to control the online narrative hasn’t been paying attention. This bill, although pushed by Labor, was first introduced by the Liberal Party.
Both Labor and Liberal were also in agreement when it came to baning social media for people under 16.
During the pandemic, they worked together to give big pharmaceutical companies indemnity.
Together, they bent the knee to unelected organisations like the United Nations, the World Health Organisation, and the World Economic Forum.
When in power, both parties ran up our nation’s debt and have had a hand in destroying our nation’s culture.
They pushed an unsustainable immigration policy which is fundamentally changing our nation, eroding sovereignty, destroying culture, and handing even more power to the globalists.
The Liberal and the Labor Party pretend to be different in order to placate the masses so that they can win power to do exactly as the other party would have done.
I cannot stress enough how important it is for people to realise this. The two-party system is a choice in name only. Any real hope of change is an illusion.
But things are even worse than that.
Even if Peter Dutton had a mind to free Australia from the tyrannical grip of the globalist elite (which he does not) it’s the faceless bureaucrats who run our nation from the shadows.
The name on the door of the Prime Minister’s office is largely irrelevant. The key public servants who guide and massage the thinking of those who think they have power, are never going anywhere.
We have all watched in awe as President Trump has entered the White House with handpicked public servants to implement his agenda.
That’s not how things work here in Australia.
While the public can appoint a new government, the same old, tired, and ideological bureaucrats continue to rule the country with an iron fist from the shadows.
Government ministers from both sides of the divide care more about keeping their jobs, their status, and their salaries than they do about you.
If they cared about you, they would make decisions that put Australia first. But they don’t. They never do. Australia is always second or third in line. Always.
The upcoming federal election is crucial to the future direction of our nation. But people are mistaken if they think voting for Mr Dutton is the antidote for the affliction of Prime Minister Albanese.
Dutton is Albanese and Albanese is Dutton. Only the colour of the ties are different.
If Australians want actual change, they must vote for disrupters, for people not wedded to the century-old two-party system that ensures the more things change, the more they stay the same.
Senator Ralph Babet, United Australia Party