by JOHN MIKKELSEN – A FEW short years ago, Australia was known as The Lucky Country; now in the eyes of the developed world, we are rapidly becoming the dumb country.
Much of that is down to the fact that our Federal Labor Government refuses to acknowledge the rest of the world’s industrialised nations are rapidly embracing clean, reliable nuclear energy under bi-partisan agreements.
- Meanwhile, Chris Bowen and The Greens are singing from the same renewables hymn sheet.
- Labor, Greens and Teals are the ones with tunnel vision.
- Their contributions to rational debate are as puerile and pathetic as three-eyed fish memes.
Our Labor leaders seem incapable of even having a rational debate about lifting the current irrational ban.
Opposition leader Peter Dutton, flanked by Nationals leader David Littleproud, Energy spokesman Ted O’Brien and Shadow Treasurer Angus Taylor, last week finally released the long-awaited costings of their plan to integrate nuclear plants into the energy grid with a claimed 44 per cent cost saving over Labor’s rush to unreliable renewables.
NUCLEAR
The new independent analysis from Frontier Economics, which has previously produced reports for the Labor Government, revealed that including nuclear power in Australia’s energy mix could save $263b, which aligns with a recent US Department of Energy’s Nuclear Liftoff Report showing an estimated 37 per cent cost reduction with nuclear.
Under the Coalition’s plan, nuclear power could supply 38 per cent of Australia’s energy needs by 2050, together with 53 per cent of renewables, delivering reliable baseload power and significantly reducing emissions.
Meanwhile, we have bipartisan agreement to purchase eight nuclear submarines under the AUKUS agreement, which will be operated by Australian Navy personnel who will eat, sleep and breathe alongside nuclear reactors for weeks at a time, any nuclear waste will be disposed of in Australia and the subs will be housed and serviced in Australian ports.
No worries, all good, according to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and Energy Minister Chris Bowen.
We also have one of the world’s largest uranium mines at South Australia’s Roxby Downs and remain a significant exporter of uranium oxide ore to other countries utilising nuclear energy.
But we don’t do any processing to produce enriched uranium and fuel rods and we recently banned the development of further rich uranium deposits at Jabiluka in the Northern Territory after some opposition from local Aboriginals and the usual woke Lefties.
They also see new gold and coal mines or gas developments just about anywhere as cardinal sins or death blows to mythical Rainbow Serpents and Blue-Banded Bees.
So the reaction from Labor, Greens and Teals to the Coalition’s costings came as no big surprise to anyone.
Chris Bowen and Greens leader Adam Bandt were apparently singing from the same recycled renewables hymn sheet when they called it a “con job”.
Environment Minister Tanya Plibersek claimed the only person who believed nuclear energy would be cheaper was the Nationals’ Barnaby Joyce, and the Teals seem to think it’s all just an excuse to keep coal generation in the system longer.
Education Minister Jason Clare said the nuclear plan would “last as long as a seafood milkshake”.
PATHETIC
Their contributions to rational debate were about as puerile and pathetic as the memes posted when the Coalition first announced their policy to include seven new nuclear plants at existing coal-fired power station sites and utilise existing transmission networks.
We were greeted with images of three-eyed fish and Blinky Bill, along with warnings of how unsafe any move to nuclear energy would be.
Bowen says Australia should “stick to the plan” regarding renewables and “not isolate itself from the rest of the world by embracing nuclear, the dearest form of energy, which would take too long to establish”.
But according to Statista.com, nuclear reactors connected to the grid in 2022 had a median construction time of 89 months or almost 7.5 years.
The World Nuclear Association (WNA) says nuclear is the world’s second largest source of low-carbon power (26 per cent of the total in 2020 and growing since then). There are 440 operable reactors, with 61 under construction.
More than 50 countries now utilise nuclear energy in 22 research reactors, which are also used for the production of medical and industrial isotopes, as well as for training.
This includes the Lucas Heights nuclear reactor which has operated successfully since 1958, with an update by the Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation (ANSTO) to an Opal Multipurpose reactor in 2007.
THREE-EYED
That’s in the heart of Sydney, but I’m unaware of any three-eyed fish or mutant koalas there.
Actually, thousands of Australians have been the beneficiaries of radium treatments thanks to the Lucas Heights output.
It reminds me of the time as a young teenager, a specialist performed an operation to remove an encroaching opaque growth known as a pterygium from one of my eyes.
I’d spent too much time fishing and surfing under the tropical Queensland sun, apparently, and back then radium was used to help prevent any re-growth.
After the delicate op performed under local anaesthetic, I was still on the operating table when a nurse arrived and placed a slide containing a radiation isotope over my eye.
“I’ll be back shortly,” she assured me.
I closed my eyes and relaxed and I’m not sure how much time passed before she re-appeared and sounded all flustered and apologetic.
“Oh, I’m sorry I got held up and couldn’t get back sooner when I should have.”
Great. Should I be worried? Should she tell the surgeon?
Anyway, I was discharged and didn’t think too much about it until my mother and I were on a steam train headed back to my old home town of Bundaberg.
I was still groggy from pain killers and with a patch over one eye, I dozed off. Then something woke me, I opened my one good eye but everything was pitch black.
“Mum, I can’t see, I’m blind!” I blurted.
Why was my lovely mother laughing?
“Don’t worry, John, we’re just going through a tunnel.”
Well I never did grow a third eye like the Blinky Bill meme, these days I still have 20/20 vision as confirmed by my driver’s licence renewal test, while Labor, Greens and Teals are the only ones with tunnel vision.
UNRELIABLE
It’s incomprehensible they continue to claim we should be the only industrialised nation to attempt to get anywhere near the fabled “net-zero” by 2050 by relying totally on unreliable renewables.
This will involve destroying an area greater than the size of Tasmania, including arable farmland, native forests, vast koala habitats, offshore fishing grounds and whale migration routes.
But there is some hope on the horizon if a majority of Australians actually recognise the facts from the spin when we elect a new government next year.
If Labor, however, is returned – possibly in a minority Greens alliance – we are in for a very bleak future with blackouts and load-shedding becoming the new norm and power bills inevitably continuing their rapid upward spiral.
Can we become The Lucky Country again? PC
All politicians need to declare their pecuniary interests in this matter.
It’s all about the money. This is the biggest con perpetrated on ordinary people that the world has ever seen. It is immoral, deceitful and utterly cruel to inflict hardship on vulnerable people who simply want to be able to keep themselves warm (or cool) and be able to afford to buy food after paying their extortionate power bills.
The world is finally waking up to this scam but the damage to our businesses, industries and economy will take years to recover, however, trust in our governments are now irreparably damaged and they will ultimately be held to account at election time.
Excellent Op Ed John, albeit, one aspect that not only you, but most other journalists also fall for & that relates to your continued use of ‘their’ word – ‘renewables’.
Unsurprisingly, that’s an invented word by the marketing machine working behind the scenes promoting wind & solar-PV technology because of its positive connotations. And they’ve been extra-ordinally successful in getting their ‘word’ ingrained into the brains of the gullible.
However, nothing could be further from the truth. Every time it’s used by those critical of the technology is like giving a free kick to the other side. Why would you do that?
The more accurate word to use to describe the intermittent, variable nature of power generated by wind & solar-PV’s is the ‘Unreliables’ and/or ‘Unreliable Energy’ as the case maybe that, importantly, carries with it, the far more accurate negative connotations that are an anathema to ‘Clim-mateers’!
So, there’s your challenge in future Op Ed.’s John – unreliables V’s the renewables is the more accurate description of the renewables.
As for the author’s use of the word “renewables,” he calls them “unreliable renewables” a couple of times in this article, as in:
“It’s incomprehensible they continue to claim we should be the only industrialised nation to attempt to get anywhere near the fabled “net-zero” by 2050 by relying totally on unreliable renewables.”
The only time “renewables” is used without this qualification is in a quote from Blackout Bowen.
Good one John!