Australia trapped with Leftie-woke politicians

by PAUL COLLITS – AUSTRALIA has no leader of sufficient charisma and brand recognition to unite its disparate Right-of-centre micro Parties. 

Absent unity and popular appeal, conservative voters are doomed to the Liberal Party model of almost equally numbered, warring moderate and conservative factions who endlessly play political games while the nation burns. 

On the Liberal side, we are doomed to heading towards the cliff at a slightly slower pace than Labor’s rush towards it. Occasionally there are small wins but the direction of travel never changes.

Annabel Denham is a name probably not known to many Australians, nor even to her fellow Britons. She is a commentator and Deputy Comment Editor for The Telegraph newspaper in London.

Recently Denham stumbled upon and wrote about the core problem facing those among the outsider class who see conventional Party politics as the path to attaining power and of beginning a reversal to normalcy.

TAKEOVER

That is, in Britain and Australia. The Americans have found a way of squaring this circle.

He is called Donald J Trump, who, having engineered a takeover of the previously elitist and awful Republican Party, is now setting out to crush the unelected elites in the bureaucracy. (Who knows if any Trump-led gains over the next four years will not later be reversed?)

Denham’s article was crisply titled: “If Farage succeeds in destroying the Tories, we are doomed to perpetual Left-wing rule.

“The Reform Party Leader knows what has gone wrong – but he can never hope to fix it.”

The argument is spot on. The more success Farage has, with or without Elon Musk, the more he will simply doom the Tories and his own Reform UK to a perpetual race for second in British elections.

Goofball Starmer and his Labour successors will simply occupy the Treasury benches forever, and sentence the mother country to hell on earth. Farage’s efforts will have been for nothing.

We have seen this playing out this week past in Victoria. Awful, awful nonentities squabbling over nothing. A change at the helm, but with little sign of focused intent or hope of systemic, sustained change.

The reason for the stalemate lies in the electoral system of each country. Whether it is FPP (first past the post) or our antipodean version of preferential voting, each jurisdiction is fated to rule by one or other branch of the UniParty.

This is what MAGA-man Jack Posobiec has called the “woke lite”. Globalist, socially liberal, comfortable with international capitalism, anti-religion, embracing of diversity and mass immigration. Big government with corporate ties. The elite club.

On the Liberal side, we are doomed to always-moderate-inclined rule – aka heading towards the cliff at a slightly slower pace than Labor’s rush towards it.

Occasionally there are little wins and small signs of hope – as in the Voice referendum and proposals for nuclear energy – but the overall direction of travel never changes.

The Australian dilemma is summed up in one man. His name is Craig Kelly.

He left the Liberal Party to join Clive Palmer’s United Australia Party. Then he left the UAP to join One Nation. And now he has left One Nation – seemingly in decline with financial woes and also losing a NSW Upper House member – to join the Libertarian Party.

HELL

One hell of an example of the law of diminishing returns. Literally. Kelly may or may not have had good reasons for each switch. And he is a very good man.

He has courageously pursued the right causes on all the issues that matter to freedom-fighters. But his continued progressions sideways do rather sum up the problem.

Back to Annabel Denham of The Telegraph. Her content is as crisp and succinct as her headline. It has much force, and bears reflection in each country.

She concludes: “In the space of just a month Britain has witnessed two symbolic political moments. First, Reform polled higher than Labour.

“Then, this week, its membership reportedly powered past the most recent Tory tally of 131,000. The country’s long-threatened populist shake-up is happening faster than we could have imagined this time last year.

“The Tories are rattled: by quibbling Reform’s card carrier numbers on Thursday, Kemi Badenoch committed her first major unforced error.

But you can see why they’re worried; as Conservative central office will well know, members means foot soldiers – the volunteers who campaign, drop leaflets, set up branch offices and turn voter intentions into crosses at the ballot box.

“If Reform’s new members are prepared to buckle down to this, they are going to be a formidable force.”

So far for Reform UK, so good. But with the Tories destroyed – after all Farage’s goal is to cannibalise the Conservative Party not unite the Right – what comes next?”

The question is, will they ever gain office and be in a position to reverse things?

Starmer’s administration is the most dangerous in decades. The Tories are as yet light years away from convincing us they can reinvent themselves.

So Reform is an increasingly plausible alternative.

But perhaps we should say the quiet part out loud: what if putting our faith in this new Party is no better than a desperately thirsty man gulping buckets of saltwater while lost at sea?

Farage would need to take Labour votes in big numbers. Recent polls show Reform threatening Labour, already very much on the nose so early in its five-year term.

But that doesn’t mean conversion into seats in 2029. We saw this last July. Great polling resulted in sod-all seats.

In Australia, the fractured alt-Right simply won’t even get close, certainly not in the House of Representatives.

DESTROY

They will never destroy the Liberals or Nationals. The best they can hope for – and this would not be nothing – would be to win enough seats to force the Coalition to deal in order to achieve minority government.

Equally, the establishment Right in Australia continues to seek distance from the Aussie renegades. It is a standoff.

Nigel Farage in the UK is not (currently) interested in doing deals with the Tories. That might change come the next election.

Meantime, 80 per cent of voters – if Matt Goodwin’s numbers are taken at face value – continue to feel unrepresented in relation to the issues that matter to them.

It is the same in Australia, notwithstanding Peter Dutton’s gentle tilt to the Right.

In neither country do outsiders feel any suggestion that future mainstream conservative Parties will reverse the awful policies visited upon us by both major Parties.

What, then, can be done? Are there solutions? They have been widely canvassed here, and do not bear repetition in detail.

Simply turning away from politics, seeking parallel societies, have merit but these days, government is both big and massively intrusive in private life.

Changing politics matters, even if you head for the hills, turn off social media, pay in cash, buy local, use internet platforms that protect privacy (VPNs, Brave, Signal) and avoid paying tax.

Do all these things, by all means. Yet that will still leave bad to awful governments in Canberra and London.

RIGGED

Politics still matters, regrettably. And the system is, indeed, rigged in favour of Parties which, long ago, stopped listening to voters or caring if they were destroying their countries.

Trump has shown that political courage can work. Albanese is awful, just like Kamala. But the American system allows for radical change.

A landslide political victory can bring broad reform, even revolution. We, on the other hand, cannot simply bring stars like Elon and Vivek and RFK Jr and Tulsi Gabbard into the Cabinet.

We don’t have executive orders that can reverse evil at the stroke of a presidential pen. We are stuck with a permanent leftie-woke bureaucracy, whoever wins.

Our Senate is populated by Greens and morons. We have to beg clowns like Pocock and Lambie not to pass evil legislation like the MAD bill. Beg them!

The Americans have primary elections. Well, normally. We only get to pick from the time-servers, ideologues, wimps and crooks that the two branches of the UniParty endlessly throw up for us.

Free thinkers need not apply if they wish to be pre-selected next time. Rinse, repeat.

That is our endless problem. Hence, in the short term, things do not look that flash.

Whether we-the-people are doomed is an open question. It is that scary. Our liberal democracy is in the balance.PC

Paul Collits

MAIN PHOTOGRAPH: Leftist Liberal Senator Andrew Bragg.  (courtesy The Sydney Morning Herald)

5 thoughts on “Australia trapped with Leftie-woke politicians

  1. Agree Paul. The Senate and Reps elections need to be on the same timetable, once every 3 (or 4?) years. It may provide voters with a shot at making an effective choice. Senate half elections are a safety valve for incumbents.
    , not voters
    The major parties are factional swamps.The decimation of the LPA, in NSW at least, began in earnest nearly 40 years ago. It affected the Federal Parliament at an earlier time. My knowledge of other states and those elected says it occurred ‘progressively’ nation-wide.Its now underpinned by lobbyists, and career trajectory of those loyal to them.
    How did it happen? Follow the money. Renewables is the most recent rat hole.

    Non moderates fulminate but struggle to support candidates because they,’conservatives’ (?) or plain Liberals, are disorganised and continually outflanked even in negotiating for places on senate and legislative councils lists.

    Federal intervention in NSW? 7 or 8 seats without a candidate. The moderates influence is perpetuated by LPA elders, what is going on Mr Dutton.

    Quality candidates rarely seek preselection, they will not fall into factional lines. Within the conservative faction there is no leadership or organisation, lots of back biting and puffed up self importance, commonly devoid of any particular competence or electoral impact.

    19
  2. Dear Politicom, Could you please get this critically important and urgent information out there please > Thank you.

    FROM ALIGNED COUNCIL OF AUSTRALIA
    2024 amendments to the International Health regulations 2005
    Feedback to Joint standing committee on treaties
    Get Started!
    We have a number of concerns about what the WHO is proposing under the 2024 amendments to the International Health Regulation 2005 (2024 IHRs). The most concerning can be summarised into 5 topics:

    Choice – the right to make choices for you and your family
    Censorship – the right to be able to speak freely and receive information
    Surveillance – in the form of tracking and tracing
    Control – countries will have to implement the changes into their domestic legislation
    Cost – both financial and social

    The Joint Standing Committee on Treaties (JSCT) is an Australian government committee that has asked for your feedback on the 2024 IHRs.

    It’s easy and we encourage you to give your feedback, which closes 23 January 2025.

    We will be sending our feedback to the government on the concerns we share about the WHO’s 2024 International Health Regulation Amendments (IHRs). We encourage you all to do the same, and we have made it easy for you to lodge your own submission on the link below. It will only take 5-10 minutes using our summary of the issues to assist. We encourage you all to raise your voice again in 2025, and to make yourselves heard.
    The new page on our website (link below) also incudes some bullet points which can be used in conversation when discussing the WHO. Please feel free to use them when discussing or emailing about WHO concerns if you find them helpful.

    Please click on the link below to read though the 2024 IHRs, and follow the steps to lodge your submission BEFORE 23 January 2025.
    https://alignedcouncilofaustralia.com.au/2024ihrs/

  3. Not true Paul. A bureaucratic clean out is in the hands of an incoming House majority. Allowing public servants into ministers offices is a consistent blunder. They are meant to be helpful but too many are bureaucratic stalking horses. I instance the role of Liberal apparatchiks eg Tony Nutt, in staffing ministers offices. It is not effective, stop it. Too often career development for apparatchiks and factional influencers and lobbyists.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *