by SEAN BURKE – ANTHONY Albanese’s prime ministership has become prey to his hand-chosen inner circle – those he has kept close since his student days as a socialist activist.
Many of his favoured advisers are ageing Marxists hell bent on appropriating Mr Albanese’s authority to inflict their radical world-view on mainstream Australian families.
- The PM hitched his wagon to race-based identity politics.
- It’s now without question that Mr Albanese skates in Kevin Rudd’s shoes.
- He has been undone by his own appointed supporters.
And the Prime Minister has been unwilling to push back. To use his own words: “Why would I?” In short, it’s because he agrees with them.
Mr Albanese adopted their “crash or crash through” strategy on day one of his premiership. Mercifully, he’s now crashing spectacularly.
MENTOR
While claiming Bob Hawke as his political mentor, it’s now without question that Mr Albanese is skating in Kevin Rudd’s shoes.
Mr Rudd bound his prime ministership to climate politics – “the great moral challenge of our generation”.
As a result, he was cheered on and idolised by Leftist politicians and inner-city elites. All was good.
But, when Mr Rudd failed to deliver for them at a Copenhagen climate summit in 2009 they turned. He was dragged crying and kicking from the Lodge within six months.
Confusingly, as Mr Rudd had done, Anthony Albanese has hitched his wagon to another second-tier issue. This time, it was race-based identity politics.
The Indigenous Voice was to be the new PM’s Mabo, Sorry Day and sit-down money trump card – he’d planned to outshine Paul Keating, Kevin Rudd and Gough Whitlam combined.
Instead, he has been undone by his own appointed supporters who have viciously and publicly taunted Australians for simply asking reasonable questions prior to offering their support.
Prof Marcia Langton, who sits on Mr Albanese’s Voice advisory group, this week said the quiet bit out loud.
ANNIHILATION
With the October 14 Voice referendum facing almost certain annihilation, she launched a tirade at Western Australia’s Edith Cowan University.
“Every time the No case raises their arguments, if you start pulling it apart, you get down to base racism – I’m sorry to say that’s where it lands – or sheer stupidity,” Prof Langton told her audience.
Her comments were captured on video and widely released via social media.
Mr Albanese is yet to push back on Prof Langton’s ugly smear. Why would he?
We suspect that he quietly agrees.PC
Quote
Former prime minister John Howard says the main reason a lot of Australians will vote ‘No’ to the Voice to Parliament is the government’s “failure” to explain what is involved.
A Reserve Strategic poll found 57 per cent of voters are planning to vote ‘No’ and only 39 per cent of voters in Western Australia and Queensland support the referendum.
“We have no idea of precisely how this body is going to be elected,” Mr Howard told Sky News host Paul Murray.
“We haven’t been told precisely how many people are going to be elected, we haven’t been told what their terms of engagement are once they’ve been elected.
“We’ve been told ‘if you vote for it we’ll tell you then’ – that is nothing short of insulting to the Australian people.”
Quote
“by SEAN BURKE – ANTHONY Albanese’s prime ministership has become prey to his hand-chosen inner circle – those he has kept close since his student days as a socialist activist.”
Some might have heard recently that Prime Minister Albanese advised his factional comrades that he is still one of them despite his public image building as a trustworthy centre left politics leader.
The bad attitudes of the now elderly once student activists, fellow travellers with the Communist Party of Australia, and internationally, and importers of the US Black Panther Movement political tactics is frightening in the extreme.
They demonstrate an entitlement mentality based on ancestry and ghosts of the past, perceived to be good and bad. However many or most of them have mixed ancestry, and like me, like you, they are Australians in the Commonwealth of Australia since 1901. If they had a good reason to demand reparations it would the British Empire Government, they decided to establish colonies here and did. However when the First Fleet sailed into Botany Bay there were two French warships at anchor on the northern shoreline and a base camp established on shore, the area named after the ship’s senior officer La Perouse. Following discussions the French agreed to depart and leave the British to proceed with colonisation plans.
The Fleet then sailed to Port Jackson where Sydney Town was established.
The very bad attitudes and name calling by the present day Aboriginal Activists is not fair or reasonable.
Their long plotted for Uluru Statement is divisive and racist, by Australians of mixed heritage?
Albanese Labor stands condemned for proceeding with a plan to undermine our multicultural nation, to transfer sovereignty to a small percentage of 3.7 per cent of the population according to the last census, and demand compensation/reparations from the substantial majority of multicultural Australians, most of whom have no direct ancestry link to the period 1788 to 1901.
The video now widely distributed and commentary from Thomas Mayo/Mayor, Uluru Statement committee member, and his colleague in another video, Ms Reid, make it clear what the hidden details contain that the Prime Minister and comrades want to keep hidden before we vote and the objectives are scary.
Communism, Marxism, far left political agenda.
Vote No
I am not a member of any political party, I am not a member of the No side. I am an older Australian who cares.
Australia’s sovereignty is the bloodline birthright of an English family, who illegally established Australia on the proven lie of terra nullius.
And you monarchists dare complain about an inner circle? You complain about ‘elites’? You complain about racial preference?
The hypocrisy is staggering.
Quote
A Crown colony or royal colony was a colony administered by the Crown within the English and later British Empire. There was usually a governor to represent the Crown, appointed by the British monarch on the advice of the UK Government, with or without the assistance of a local council. In some cases, this council was split into two: an executive council and a legislative council, and the executive council was similar to the Privy Council that advises the monarch. Members of executive councils were appointed by the governors, and British citizens resident in Crown colonies either had no representation in local government, or limited representation in a lower house. In several Crown colonies, this limited representation grew over time. As the House of Commons of the British Parliament has never included seats for any of the colonies, there was no direct representation in the sovereign government for British subjects or citizens residing in Crown colonies.
Oh Dear Noel – try spouting something original instead of Socialist spite! You are prepared to attach yourself to race-based identity politics? Just one of Marcia’s Langton’s mob evidently without an original thought? I care about the future of this country for my grand-children and great-grand children. Hopefully it will not be left to the political likes of you.
WHOSE hypocrisy? Oh really Noel. Do some research!!!! QUOTE “The bad attitudes of the now elderly once student activists, fellow travellers with the Communist Party of Australia, and internationally, and importers of the US Black Panther Movement political tactics is frightening in the extreme.” The PM has also hitched his wagon to race-based identity politics.