Prove him wrong, someone. Murdoch executives should be in jail for industrial scale manslaughter – and now they have done this to us.

Of course, Dowd’s 15m includes many children who were not remotely threatened by COVID but were forced or pressured to take the jab. By the very same political Parties now feigning concern about the welfare of children.

The State injectables were forced upon us by cowering governments controlled by puppeteer media barons who were themselves the puppets of the Big Pharma companies who keep the legacy media afloat.

Of course, there is something else familiar about the emergent “let them be kids” world view, something that we saw during the COVID madness.

It is the willingness of people to hand over their freedoms and decision-making to the State, without asking questions and without considering the consequences.

USELESS

We were willing to wear useless masks, to get the death jab, to stay in our homes, to accept being banned from churches, to brand non-conformists granny killers, to line up all the way around the block to get a useless PCR test, to sign over our privacy through contact tracing machines, to suffer five-kilometre travel restrictions, to hand over a trillion in taxes to ScoMo to hose it up against the wall. And the rest.

This campaign should have been called “let everyone be treated like kids”.

Perhaps newspapers and the ABC should be made (somehow) to stop 13-to-16 year-olds from accessing the anxiety-inducing climate lies they regularly tell.

Australia has form on this. On handing over our freedoms and responsibilities to the State, without demur. Or to corporations, in the case of our willingness to trade privacy for convenience in the matter of smart phones.

Prove him wrong, someone. Murdoch executives should be in jail for industrial scale manslaughter – and now they have done this to us.

Of course, Dowd’s 15m includes many children who were not remotely threatened by COVID but were forced or pressured to take the jab. By the very same political Parties now feigning concern about the welfare of children.

The State injectables were forced upon us by cowering governments controlled by puppeteer media barons who were themselves the puppets of the Big Pharma companies who keep the legacy media afloat.

Of course, there is something else familiar about the emergent “let them be kids” world view, something that we saw during the COVID madness.

It is the willingness of people to hand over their freedoms and decision-making to the State, without asking questions and without considering the consequences.

We were willing to wear useless masks, to get the death jab, to stay in our homes, to accept being banned from churches, to brand non-conformists granny killers, to line up all the way around the block to get a useless PCR test, to sign over our privacy through contact tracing machines, to suffer five-kilometre travel restrictions, to hand over a trillion in taxes to ScoMo to hose it up against the wall. And the rest.

This campaign should have been called “let everyone be treated like kids”.

Perhaps newspapers and the ABC should be made (somehow) to stop 13-to-16 year-olds from accessing the anxiety-inducing climate lies they regularly tell.

Australia has form on this. On handing over our freedoms and responsibilities to the State, without demur. Or to corporations, in the case of our willingness to trade privacy for convenience in the matter of smart phones.

BRICK

This attack on free access to the internet is merely another brick in the erection of the tyrannical wall. Some might argue that the undoubted addiction of many to social media is itself part of the problem. Maybe, but ever more State and corporate surveillance and control are not the answer. They are never the answer.

But back to the unexpected anti-social media allies, Williams’ ABC and Murdoch.

It is no coincidence that both News Corp and the ABC have the word “corporation” in their titles, or that they work hand in glove with the Big State. It calls something else to mind.

When defining fascism, why not go to the Big Guy himself? Mussolini weighed in: “Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of State and corporate power”.

Right from the horse’s mouth. It is all of a piece with globalist agendas and the public health tyranny. Fascism in the 1930s was pretty popular, too, in the countries that practiced it.

Which brings us to Peter Dutton and his embrace of the age restriction legislation. It is beginning to look as though when Murdoch says “jump”, the Liberal Party asks, “how high?” Certainly, this has occurred on this issue, this year.

Peter Dutton must feel that he needs Murdoch’s papers on side to win the next election. He knows he won’t get Kim Williams’ vote and that of the ABC crowd.

What else could explain Dutton’s manic support for this crazy legislation and our coming ever closer of the panopticon?

Of course, digital ID itself was originally a (Liberal) Paul Fletcher idea. And it was Dutton’s own department (under ScoMo) that commissioned fact checkers who went after anti-vaxxer dissidents during the plandemic.

I tend to think that the world will look at us with contempt rather than in awe, as some seem to be suggesting, over our rush to internet fascism.

Global reactions to our “world first” legislation seem, at best, decidedly mixed.

Peter Dutton won’t care what the rest of the world thinks. He just wants to win government.

Nor will Kim Williams, who wants to shut Joe Rogan down. Nor will Albo and Michelle Rowland, who just like centralised State control over people. Nor will Rupert Murdoch, who just wants social media fenced in.

This smells like convergent opportunism practised by many bad actors, all with their own agendas, and serial sneaks never letting an engineered “crisis” go to waste. Just like COVID.

The Government doesn’t even seem exactly to know which companies will be dragooned into doing their surveilling for them – or how age verification will work.

Dutton and all of the other champions of this rubbish legislation do not care how it is done, despite mumblings about not accepting digital ID.  We should, though.   And, for once, vote accordingly.

HASTY

Meanwhile, YouTube – not mentioned by Commissar Rowland, at least not so far – has responded to the “world first” legislation: “We are disappointed by the Australian Parliament’s hasty passage of this Bill.

“Online safety is crucial, but effective regulation requires consultation and careful consideration.

“This rushed legislation overlooks the fundamental differences between services and the unique benefits these can deliver to Australian youth.

“We urge the Government to swiftly follow through on their commitment to preserve access to services that ‘operate with a significant purpose to enable young people to get the education and health support they need’ and pass legislative rules that clearly exempt YouTube, thereby providing certainty to Australian families, creators, teachers, and educators.”

Interesting points. Self-serving, for sure. And ironic, too, given YouTube’s own, well-known record of censorship and doing the bidding of Big Pharma and Big Government.

But there is much more in play here. Who knows how a future government might extend this sold-as-benign, perhaps widely supported piece of tyranny to all sorts of other areas of internet access and surveillance in the future?

The direction of travel is decidedly not benign.

Let us all be made kids. Surveilled and mute in the face of Big Brother and of our smiling oppressors.PC

– Paul Collits