THE train has left the station wrote one journalist, echoing the mainstream media pack on net-zero emissions.
Forget that Professor Ian Plimer has demonstrated this is based on the greatest scientific fraud ever perpetrated.
- No warmist politician, media practitioner or carpetbagger takes “global warming” seriously.
- Beijing, Moscow nor Delhi are going to be so stupid as to go for net-zero.
Or that, as Japan’s expert climate negotiator, Professor Jun Arima confirms, net zero will impoverish us while enriching Beijing’s genocidal communist billionaires, something Western politicians have been doing for decades.
SELL-OUT
Having won an election denouncing net-zero, media cover will enable Scott Morrison to deliver a bipartisan sell-out to Beijing.
Whenever a media pack forms, rational debate goes out the window.
As it was over Chamberlain’s flight to Munich, the disastrous Turnbull-Keating politicians’ republic, the media-aided plots to replace Howard with Rudd, Abbott with Turnbull and Trump with anyone.
Nowadays the elites endorse whatever bizarre Marxist dogma lands on our shores.
Corrupted by Beijing, they pretend not to notice the comparative advantages the communists use, slave labour, workers reduced to serfs and what cranky Swedish schoolgirls call “dirty” energy, ie, from our beautiful coal.
On this, British PM Boris Johnson has only now realised why the prophesised green jobs from his hideous windfarms never eventuated.
CARPETBAGGERS
They’re all with Beijing’s serfs using energy from our coal.
Whatever they say, no warmist politician, media practitioner or carpetbagger takes “global warming” seriously.
If they did, they’d have carbon footprints the size of mendicant friars, they’d never fly and never promote those fairy tales about batteries and green hydrogen, etc, funded by taxpayers’ billions.
Whatever they say, neither Beijing, Moscow nor Delhi are going to be so stupid as to go for net-zero.
Instead, while we’re reduced to penury, they’ll be laughing all the way to the bank along with our politicians and carpetbaggers.PC
The Earth is finite but the increasing human population and its ever growing aspirations increase demand for the Earth’s resources. It is inevitable that a point will be reached where the Earth’s limitations will be reached. That aside, reducing demand on the atmosphere is wise and is simply basic stewardship, which the attendees at COP26 who arrived by 400 private jets have ignored. Alternative energy sources simply can’t replace many of the essential pieces of equipment we need to feed the population (EG large farm tractors and harvesters can never by electric because they need to work 24/7 at harvest time and a battery big enough to drive it would be too heavy for the soil in the fields to support). There would be no 400 private jets available to fly politicians to summits all over the globe either, but you can bet the CCP/Chinese will be taking full advantage of our politicians and telling what they want to hear and selling them everything they dream of to win green votes.
we
Long overdue in Australia is a televised debate between qualified people on climate change and global warming claims, in my opinion a political agenda based hoax ignoring that climate change and weather conditions are natural Earth Cycle events.
When the brilliant UK mathematician Christopher Monckton (he has never claimed to be a scientist) exposed the climate fraud before the UN IPCC Copenhagen Conference, he audited the modelling figures and compared them with historical record data, the IPCC banned him from speaking at their meetings and conferences, and tried hard to denigrate him. Around that time hackers released two batches of emails exchanged between the climate fraud creators of modelling discussing how to create a warming trend and not getting caught. These were called Climate Gate 1 & 2 at that time.
Before the 2015 Paris Conference the following was recorded and published by Business Daily and other publications, and noting that UN Official Figurers is not the only person who has admitted;
U.N. Official Reveals Real Reason Behind Warming Scare
FacebookTwitterLinkedInShare Licensing
06:43 PM ET 02/10/2015
Economic Systems: The alarmists keep telling us their concern about global warming is all about man’s stewardship of the environment. But we know that’s not true. A United Nations official has now confirmed this.
At a news conference last week in Brussels, Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of U.N.’s Framework Convention on Climate Change, admitted that the goal of environmental activists is not to save the world from ecological calamity but to destroy capitalism.
“This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution,” she said.
Referring to a new international treaty environmentalists hope will be adopted at the Paris climate change conference later this year, she added: “This is probably the most difficult task we have ever given ourselves, which is to intentionally transform the economic development model for the first time in human history.”
The only economic model in the last 150 years that has ever worked at all is capitalism. The evidence is prima facie: From a feudal order that lasted a thousand years, produced zero growth and kept workdays long and lifespans short, the countries that have embraced free-market capitalism have enjoyed a system in which output has increased 70-fold, work days have been halved and lifespans doubled.
Figueres is perhaps the perfect person for the job of transforming “the economic development model” because she’s really never seen it work. “If you look at Ms. Figueres’ Wikipedia page,” notes Cato economist Dan Mitchell: Making the world look at their right hand while they choke developed economies with their left.
Australia’s emissions are trending down since 2005, the UN IPCC Kyoto Agreement target was exceeded here, one of the very few signatory nations that did even achieve the targets set, and now is on track to meet the Paris Agreement target by 2030.
Assuming that essential to life Carbon Dioxide (CO2) reduction was needed (CO2 is not Carbon (C) or pollution) amounting to a low in history 410 ppm (0.041%) in the atmosphere, and that food crop yields would be far higher with 1,000 ppm or higher, the fact is that Australia is a world leader for reducing emissions. Australia contributes 1.3% of global total while China contributes 28.0% and increasing by more than Australia’s emissions every year. Yet being a developing nation according to the UN emissions from China increasing is acceptable, but Australia must do better than so far achieved?
If the end of the world from over-heating was the disaster about to happen the globalists claim no nation would be exempted, and no stupid delegates would dare fly in hundreds of aircraft to COP26 in Glasgow to be driven around in Electric Vehicles recharged by Diesel Generators needed because of the electricity supply problems the UK has as so called renewable (unreliable) energy fails to supply the grid.