AUSTRALIANS would once proudly boast theirs was a nation under the rule of law. Sadly, we now live under the rule of the law-breakers.
Imprisoned, not allowed to leave the country, invited to rat on neighbours, subject to arbitrary punishment, watched from morning to night, Australians are losing their businesses, their jobs, their houses, their children’s education, even their sanity and their lives.
- With crucial checks and balances gone, power has gone to their heads.
- The cabal think they have unlimited powers to do anything they wish.
- The mountain of legal actions which will flow will result in awards of substantial damages.
Forced almost daily to absorb some new and bewildering pronunciamento from the digital equivalent of Mussolini’s Piazza Venezia balcony, repetitively exhorted to do the “right thing” and, despite their guaranteed fortune in weekly salary, their vast discretionary funds, their luxury comforts and their golden superannuation as well as their access for life to “jobs for the boys”, the dictators constantly assure us that we are “all in this together”.
If ever we are allowed to live with the Wuhan virus, how likely is it that the cabal will abandon the excessive powers they have so unconstitutionally seized?
PASSPORT
Will we have to carry and produce on demand some vaccination passport?
While only some in the cabal concede they cannot deliver a virus-free world, they’re all saying if some always fluctuating number are vaccinated, we may – may – be able to return to normality.
The truth is that as with the surrender of taxes (with the exception of Joh Bjelke-Petersen) how often (with the exception of the great Cincinnatus) do dictators surrender their ill-gotten powers?
In the meantime, the cabal recklessly insists still experimental vaccines be used on those not vulnerable, especially the healthy young, and that the vaccine be made in some way mandatory, yet they refuse to even contemplate the use of medicines to save the lives of the sick, including those endorsed by experts of international standing.
Australians never agreed to appointing a cabal of dictators. Their law-breaking excesses will inevitably lead to the award of untold millions in damages.
The cabal think they have unlimited powers to do anything they wish.
It is as if each of them were a dictator, the special magistrate appointed in the Roman republic to defend Rome against an imminent invasion but also to propitiate the gods because of some disaster such as a pestilence far worse than Wuhan.
The modern lockdown is frankly as effective as driving a nail into the wall of the Temple of Jupiter to propitiate the gods.
SUBORDINATE
But such is progress: it was never associated with terrible burdens modern dictators impose on the people.
The nail with which dictators today hammer the people is “delegated” or “subordinate legislation”.
Made under the authority of an Act of Parliament, a bewildering nomenclature is used to describe them, such as “regulations”, “ordinances”, “orders”, etc.
When we were a real Westminster democracy anything important went to the Executive Council where the case for the Governor approving it would be presented properly, thus demonstrating the central constitutional principle that the Crown is important not for the power it wields, but the power it denies others.
The people having in 1999 denied them their politicians’ republic, the political class has decided to neutralise the institution by keeping it out of the process, while also undermining parliamentary democracy by stripping the upper houses of much of their crucial power of disallowance.
Minister Hazzard would not have treated the Upper House hearing with total contempt had disallowance been on the cards.
With crucial checks and balances gone, power has gone to the heads of the cabal, an extremely dangerous situation.
It is a brutal truth, but none of them is exceptionally competent. Just look at the absolute disasters over which they preside, including but not only defence, debt, water-harvesting, energy and education.
Just a few examples will demonstrate how misfeasance has been committed, the ban on overseas travel, the closing down of the construction business in NSW without health advice, the imposition of grossly arbitrary fines, the cruel refusal to allow relatives to see dying parents, the businesses which have gone to the wall and the ending of careers.
CIVIL MISFEASANCE
All these exercises potentially constitute the civil wrong of misfeasance in public office, as the 2011 live cattle ban demonstrates.
That began with an ABC broadcast on inhumane treatment of Australian cattle exported to Indonesia.
Gillard government minister Ludwig issued an order that cattle could not be exported to twelve suspect Indonesian abattoirs. But under pressure, he then issued a total ban.
Federal Court Justice Rares found that Ludwig had been recklessly indifferent both as to the availability of his power to make an order, and to the injury which would be suffered by those affected.
The judge held that the exercise of such a power must be reasonable, proportional and rational in all of the circumstances. It clearly was not.
The mountain of legal actions which will flow from the Wuhan crisis will result in many awards of substantial damages.
Unless the government settles this, it will take years. But it will be for the taxpayers to pay any damages.
Let me repeat a proposal I made here over a year ago. This is that in such a case, the court should be empowered to require a substantial personal contribution from those responsible to the victims of their acts.
In addition, there should also be a crime of serious misfeasance in public office.
RECALL
If this were Switzerland, the people could introduce such a law without waiting for the politicians to do the right thing.
This would be done by a petition which if passed by the requisite majority would trigger a referendum.
This affair confirms a need to ensure that Australians should, like the Swiss, be empowered to themselves defend the Constitution through such tools as referendums and recall elections.PC
The entire system is totally corrupted with massive systematic and widespread conflicts of interest ! These vile conflicts of interest are absolutely staggering and this is about really serious crimes against innocent populations being committed!
These scum politicians and mainstream medicine and pharmaceutical companies and mainstream media! Those dangerous revolving doors!! The ties relationships. Partnerships memberships between politicians/governments l big pharma l mainstream medicine l. Mainstream media NEVER NEVER NEVER are any mandates EVER !!!! To be permitted as that is REAL CRIMES. CORRUPTION CONFLICTS OF INTEREST and state and federal governments have massive ties and by these tyrannical actions of mandates and all other tyrannical actions are committing the most heinous crimes against innocent populations!
All mandates and all other tyrannical government actions must be abolished now and forever more !
HEALTH AND SAFETY RISK ASSESSMENT by Gideon J Jacobs December, 2021
Conclusion: The company has complied to its obligation under the various Work Health and Safety Acts’ requirements and determined based on a risk assessment that it cannot require any employee to have a Covid-19 vaccination. It can also not discriminate against any employee based on their Covid-19 vaccination status. Any state or federal directive or mandate requiring to do so will be in contradiction to both the Queensland and Australian Work Health and Safety Acts of 2011 as well as the Australian Disability Discrimination Act 1992.”
https://documentcloud.adobe.com/link/track?uri=urn:aaid:scds:US:2ddf6b1a-c0f1-37a0-9606-87334a0892b8#pageNum=20
Brilliant analysis of these totalitarian monsters currently destroying Australians
Without great patriots like Professor Flint and Alan Jones AO; then, the MSM might NEVER have held state premiers to account. Get well soon Alan from your recent knee surgery because, we the people need you back on sky weeknights ASAP
Whilst agree with a need for this whole exercise to be done better, from both policy and legal perspectives, I doubt liability for misfeasance in public office (and we need a simpler name for it) , we also have better to define where privative provisions do and don’t protect.
‘In the meantime, the cabal recklessly insists still experimental vaccines be used on those not vulnerable, especially the healthy young, and that the vaccine be made in some way mandatory, yet they refuse to even contemplate the use of medicines to save the lives of the sick, including those endorsed by experts of international standing.’
Stopped reading at this point. Of course the vaccines are to some degree, experimental. The corona-virus evolves, and like the ‘flu, will inevitably require a new vaccine to cope with each new variant. Call that ‘experimental’ if you will. Similarly, it is clear that while the young may not be vulnerable themselves, they can be virus carriers and spreaders. Accordingly, let’s find a way to vaccinate them and prevent this outcome.
As for ‘refuse to even contemplate etc…’ is this another call for Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine? The ADF has abandoned the latter due to nasty side-effects. Hasn’t ATAGI rejected Ivermectin for human use? In other words it’s been contemplated and rejected. Look, over in the shearing shed we’ve got litres of the stuff. 5ml subcutaneously injected should be enough for David Flint, happy to oblige. If he survives that but it’s not effective, we can try bleach.
What’s with the crap reference to Mussolini?
These people are communists, not fascists. Yet, with well over 100 years of communist history to draw on, you cannot find a suitable communist moment to make your point?
Communism and Fascism are both left wing ideologies. And no, it is not because of ‘National Socialism’ though that is a clue.
A totalitarian is a totalitarian whether you want to label the scum facist or communist, the point is there is little difference between them, your point is pointless
You just agreed with my point.
We need to hold these people accountable. Otherwise they will only get worse. I am more than willing to donate to the legal battle. We need to find an organisation that will take the lead.
Exactly my point, but who is taking the lead. Some, few politicians for sure. But no media and not many of the legal profession. Are they all too scared, too gullible or in on it together.
“Imprisoned, not allowed to leave the country, invited to rat on neighbours, subject to arbitrary punishment, watched from morning to night, Australians are losing their businesses, their jobs, their houses, their children’s education, even their sanity and their lives.”
Many of us knew this from the early days of March 2020, though admittedly it has got a whole lot worse. Worse to a point even a uber cynic such as I could have hardly imagined. The corrupt political classes seem to be trying to out-tyrant each other.
I have to ask though – what is the legal profession doing about this? The politicians are trampling all over our Laws and the Constitution yet we hear nothing of any legal challenges to these treasonous infringements. You cannot talk about the ‘rule of law’ if the practitioners of such are in on the tyranny. They certainly seem to be, no challenges, no Court cases, no public comments on main stream media (unless of course that is banned). The legal profession in Australia seems as complicit and guilty as the politicians and the media.
Because most members of the legal profession are communists who support all this.