FEARS are growing that a new, race-based governing body – as proposed by Labor’s Indigenous Voice – could easily be infiltrated, resulting in unchecked communist control of Australia’s parliament.
With “Voice MPs” set to be granted wide-ranging veto powers over legislation that impacts Aboriginals – which arguably includes all legislation – executive control would effectively be handed to a tiny minority of Australians.
- The Voice could very easily result in the takeover of the country by deception.
- The Communist Party’s website has already made a connection between Aboriginal rights and parliamentary control.
- Because the Voice will be in the Constitution, the High Court would necessarily rule in its favour.
And with the Australian Communist Party having already infiltrated Australia’s Aboriginal rights movement – most recently under the violent banner of Black Lives Matter – the consequences could be nation-changing and irreversible.
“All it would take is for some socialist influence to infiltrate the Voice, just as it infiltrates everything else,” Politicom correspondent Carole Hubbard wrote this week.
“Because the Voice will be in the Constitution, the High Court would [necessarily] rule in its favour.
CONSTRUED
“Then we’ll have socialist rulings on anything and everything that may affect Aboriginal people – or can be construed as affecting them.
“No doubt they’ll find a way to extrapolate this across the whole country.”
Hubbard, a Liberal Party member, said Australians had already experienced too much political trickery.
“The Voice could very easily result in the takeover of the country by deception. We already have enough of that now. It’s time to reverse the trend.”
The Australian Communist Party currently claims about 22,000 members and attracts less than 0.12 per cent of voter support via its Socialist Alliance political front.
Concerningly, the Party’s website has already made a connection between Aboriginal rights and parliamentary control.
“The struggle for a socialist Australia is the central task of the Australian Communist Party (ACP) and has no illusions that this struggle will be led through parliament,” its website says.
“The ACP recognises that Australia was built on the dispossession of the Aboriginal peoples, the exploitation of their labour and that of convicts and migrant workers.
“A socialist Australia will strive to undo the injustices heaped on the Aboriginal peoples of the country. Questions like land rights will never be resolved under capitalism.
SOCIALISM
“Our program makes clear what our Party considers the features of socialism to be. These are the features described by Marx and Lenin…
“These principles will guide us when, after the revolutionary capture of State power by the working class, we begin to build a socialist society in Australia.
“This experience will also reveal the pitfalls to be avoided so that the danger of capitalist restoration can be avoided.”PC
What a pack of bare faced lies. The voice will be an advisory body only, subordinate to parliament, as the proposed wording makes crystal clear.
It is amazing how people who claim it is ‘not broken’ have such a disgustingly poor understanding of the difference between the constitution and possible future legislation (which any parliament can make and/ or amend) and whip up this pathetic fear campaign by conflating the two.
In May 1967, after 10 years of campaigning, a referendum on Indigenous recognition in the Australian constitution was held.
The lead-up to the poll focused public attention on the fact that Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders were treated as second-class citizens.
Nearly 91 per cent of the electorate voted to amend the constitution. This change meant that Aboriginal people would be counted as part of the population and acknowledged as equal citizens, and that the Commonwealth would be able to make laws on their behalf. This was seen to reflect public recognition of Aboriginal people as full Australian citizens.
You are wrong. The 1967 referendum was not about what you are claiming. The states of WA and QLD refused to introduce reforms that had been introduced in other states. Up until that referendum the states made laws regarding Aborigines. The referendum was to take the power from the states and give those lawmaking powers to the Federal Government. All states counted Aborigines in the Census and in states other that Qld and WA Aborigines has always been able to vote. The seats in Senate in Australia are calculated on population. To not count Aborigines would mean less seats allocated in the Senate of the Federal Parliament. On the 1st January 1901 all people in Australia including the Aborigines became Australians, the first nation enacted by law. All peoples from that moment the nation of Australia was born had protections inferred by English Common Law including the Aborigines. And yes they were Australian citizens and yes they were counted in the Census and yes they were able to vote. You need to go and read history books.
Whichever way you wish present it, it is undoubtably racist and devicive. To deny these obvious truths is to show total ignorance or worse, to divide this country for political means.
ALP Constitution
Objectives
4 The Australian Labor Party is a democratic socialist party and has the objective of the democratic socialisation of industry, production, distribution and exchange, to the extent necessary to eliminate exploitation and other anti-social features in these fields.
Our head of state is a race-based foreign monarch, selected on eugenics and breeding and bloodline.
Yet monarchists complain that an advisory body might be ‘racist’.
In other words, they are disgusting hypocrites.
Constitutional Monarch with no powers who is required to rubber stamp advice from the Prime Minister (certain cases the Governor General) of the Commonwealth of Australia.
The Monarchy was relieved of powers in the 1930s by an Act of the UK Parliament that extended to Commonwealth members and in the 1980s the Australia Act reinforced the UK Act.
It is sad that racism is creeping into the Voice debate, I noted that earlier this week from the yes side and immediately thought they know they are losing support so they decided to attack the messengers who dared to question the politics and the ambitions of the activist minority of indigenous ancestry fellow Australians. They being the bureaucrats of Aborigine & Torres Strait Islander Commission “air conditioned Aborigines” as the people ATSIC was established to help referred to the Canberra based elites.
And ATSIC was established without changing the Constitution.
Stop lying.
The Australia Act(s) changed the relationship between Canberra and Westminster. That’s it.
They did not impact the role or the identity or the powers of the monarch in any way.
I left out the other description:
Aborigines
Talking
Sh**
In
Canberra
No wonder Warren Mundine says there is no Voice demand in country and remote country
Australia is a constitutional monarchy and our head of state is the King. However, the King does not have a role in the day-to-day running of Australia. On the advice of the Prime Minister, the King appoints the Governor-General, who is the King’s representative in Australia.
The Australian Constitution delegates – gives – certain powers to the Governor-General to act on behalf of the King. These include giving Royal Assent to laws passed by the Australian Parliament and starting the process for a federal election. While these powers are exercised by the Governor-General, in reality this is normally done on the advice of the Prime Minister and ministers.
To whom does the monarch’s representative answer, if not the monarch?
“Albanese attended St Joseph’s Primary School in Camperdown and then St Mary’s Cathedral College. After finishing school, he worked for the Commonwealth Bank for two years before studying economics at the University of Sydney. There, he became involved in student politics and was elected to the Students’ Representative Council. It was also there where he started his rise as a key player in the ALP’s Labor Left.
During his time in student politics, Albanese led a group within Young Labor that was aligned with the left faction’s Hard Left, which maintained “links with broader left-wing groups, such as the Communist Party of Australia, People for Nuclear Disarmament and the African National Congress”.”