by PAUL COLLITS – THE depopulation agenda has been embraced enthusiastically by modern society, aided by cheap, readily available birth control and its accompanying self-centred mindset.
Wise thinkers from GK Chesterton to Mark Steyn (in America Alone and After America) have long seen the dangers for the future of Western societies in the collective acceptance of self-sterilisation.
- COVID and its vaccines have been a boon for the population culling brigade.
- It almost looks like a plan. If the virus doesn’t get you, the cures will.
- Hundreds of studies have emerged that the vaccine is not safe for pregnant women and the babies they’re carrying.
As Steyn has often said, “demography is destiny”. Steyn was talking about a peculiarly Western desire for self-inflicted decline.
But the will to reject the ingrained – by God – proclivity to reproduce ourselves has become a global ideology. And the depopulation embracing elites love it. They are just adding some technology, and a soupcon of climate change. And a little COVID.
CONFRONTED
What would a depopulation advocate like, say, Bill Gates offer if confronted with hard data showing that deaths were now increasing massively and births were in decline in almost equal magnitude?
And what if these developments coincided with the rollout of mRNA vaccines in which Gates himself had invested billions of dollars and the whole of his second career? “Bloody ripper”? “Couldn’t have planned it better myself”?
And, the icing on the cake? Not a single government in the world is interested in investigating either the now obvious declining birth rates nor increased excess deaths.
How good is that? A virus that specifically kills the elderly and the obese. An aged care regime that cleans up those that COVID doesn’t get. Ventilators. End-of-life drugs given free reign. No questions asked. It almost looks like a plan. If the virus doesn’t get you, the cures will.
There are basically two ways to cull the world’s population – increase deaths and decrease births. Let us look in turn at the impact of the plandemic on each of these.
Excess deaths are at levels not seen in generations. They are unprecedented in peace time. And they coincide with vaccines rollout. [see video below]
Yet they barely raise a modicum of interest among the governing classes. They are an inconvenient truth. Here are the basic outlines of the emerging picture:
- Deaths from an almost certainly engineered COVID virus, aided by vaccines which seem to have increased, not decreased, your chances of dying;
- The release of COVID mutants that also killed many people and against which the vaccines were worse than useless;
- Deaths from the vaccines, largely unacknowledged by the powers-that-be and chronically under-reported (probably by a factor of ten) through the official, “passive surveillance” mechanisms like DAEN in Australia and VAERS in the USA, yet clear to anyone with eyes on the issue;
- The remdesivir/ventilator push, in which either end-of-life drugs or massively inappropriate and often lethal “cures” were given to very sick patients;
- The denial, by law, of drugs like invermectin that could have cured people – instead, they died, while clueless politicians with blood on their hands joked about horse paste;
- Deaths from other illnesses like cancer ignored by the governments of the world and their public health bureaucracies during lockdowns and the shuttering of hospitals – deaths that will only increase over time;
- Deaths caused by the lockdowns themselves – suicides, depression, alcoholism, increased drug usage, loneliness.
Are we getting warm yet?
There is little doubt that COVID has been a boon for the population culling brigade. While the virus itself has been not the “pandemic” either predicted or hoped for (by some), it has killed off the old and the diseased in large numbers, and has provided opportunities for the metasticising death strategies outlined above.
If planned, COVID has been much more than a mere “boon”, of course. It has been weapon. Very much worth the Gates investment. And COVID could be merely the first, big release by the pandemic planning industry.
It is feared they have plenty more pandemics in store for us – if all goes according to plan with the 2024 World Health Organisation Treaty in preparation to seize control down to the last detail by WHO rather than by pesky sovereign governments.
Though, mind you, the governments of the world did a pretty fair job themselves of instigating totalitarian responses to the Wu-Flu.
SHOTS
The WHO could simply keep a watching brief on it all. And governments – mercifully, not all of them – are still rolling out the vaccines.
In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration is still authorising shots for the old and those with low immunity. Rather than removing them from the market, as they should be. The killing machine lives on.
And future pandemics will have the so-called “100 day vaccines”, if CEPI (the Centre for Epidemic Preparedness Innovation) gets its way, making Trump’s Operation Warp Speed look like a safe, seriously trialled and tested pharmaceutical roll-out. (CEPI, through its Brighton Collaboration project, also plans in future pandemics to define what counts as a vaccine side effect!)
So much for increasing deaths through pandemics. What about the impact on births of the COVID plandemic?
Birth rates are in precipitous decline. The vaccine championing buffoons of the legacy media do occasionally mention the sudden, over-the-cliff decline in birth rates, but typically attribute this to “COVID”.
DECLINING
Correlation is not causation, but it would seem more than coincidental that just about every place in the world experienced declining birth rates a matter of months after the global vaccine rollout.
David Bell notes, with particular reference to Australia: “The mRNA vaccines were released globally in early 2021 with the slogan ‘safe and effective’. Unusually for a new class of medicine, they were soon recommended by public health authorities for pregnant women.
“By late 2021, working-age women, including those who were pregnant, were being thrown out of employment for not agreeing to be injected. Those who took the mRNA vaccines did so based on trust in health authorities – the assumption being that they would not have been approved if the evidence was not absolutely clear. The role of regulatory agencies was to protect the public and, therefore, if they were approved, the ‘vaccines’ were safe.
“Most importantly, the data does not in any way support the ‘safe’ conclusion with respect to pregnancy; a conclusion of dangerous would be more accurate. The assurances of safety were, therefore, completely misleading given the data disclosures in the recent freedom of information release.”
Bell’s analysis is but one of hundreds of studies to have emerged on vaccine non-safety for pregnant women and the babies they are carrying.
We – well, readers here – already know that “safe and effective” was always an in-joke. They knew and they knew they were lying.
But what stands out here is the utter disregard for the health safety of new-born life and for mothers-to-be. Disregard that is perfectly consistent with a depopulation agenda. More correlation.
A recent study has shown mRNA in breast milk, as Dr Paul Marik has noted.
As always, the question that any good investigative journalist should ask is – what did they know, and when did they know it?
Struggling with the fact that there are no Woodward-Bernsteins in the corporate media in relation to COVID smoking guns has become a preoccupation among COVID refuseniks. For good reason.
CRAWLING
COVID regimes have been crawling with opportunities for emergent Hedley Thomases. But no, only silence.
So, the virus seems to have been a boon for the Eugenics Industrial Complex. Wherever you land on the plandemic versus convergent opportunism spectrum, you will have to admit that COVID has been a coup for those minded to cull the world’s population.
Intellectual gnomes and zero population ideologues since Malthus and up to, and including, Paul Ehrlich and his 21st Century acolytes, have been propounding the unsupported dogma that the earth could not support increased population, and have advocated measures to decrease the global people-count.
When innovative agriculture and other things proved them hopelessly wrong, they had to come up with something else to justify culling human beings.
Plan B was eugenics, which attracted a large range of adherents in the first quarter of the twentieth century, and since.
Plan C was industrial scale abortion and other forms of “reproductive health care”. Sterilisation on demand.
This was helped along enormously by Justice Harry Blackmun and colleagues on the US Supreme Court. Blackmun thought it wise to unleash forces that would see the deaths of about 50 million unborn babies in the USA in the half century that followed his enlightened decision (Roe v Wade).
He may have his own circle of hell. He put Mao, Stalin, Hitler and Pol Pot in the shade.
Plan D was euthanasia. Let’s kill off the old and infirm, and pretend to them that we are doing this in the name of “dignity”.
Plan E was some nonsense concocted by a Swedish scientist called Arrhenius in the late 19th Century, who came up with the ludicrous idea of dangerous increases in greenhouse gases in the earth’s atmosphere. Arrhenius gave rise to something called global warming, then, later, climate change and its bastard son, “net-zero”.
Plan F was, and remains, lethal vaccines, and all of the associated paraphernalia of the pandemic planning industry. A global growth sector if ever there was one.
Which brings us up to date with the big plan. Mix them all together and you get the whole sustainability concoction.
Look closely enough, and you will see that just about every seemingly benign yet really revolutionary policy decision of the past half century has been designed, strategically, to control (ie, reduce) global population.
The irony of the efforts of the globalist depopulation cult is that they, themselves, wish to live forever on earth, and are involved in endless attempts to pull this off.
Read Douglas Rushkoff’s latest book, Survival of the Richest: Escape Fantasies of the Tech Billionaires, and you will get some sense of the creepy-weird agendas of those who would wish to control our lives now. This is a truly astonishing read.
Not all tech billionaires are anti-life, as it happens. Sadly, Elon Musk is an outlier among the ruling class.
STERILITY
We live in an age of sterility and depopulation. Abortion-on-demand and euthanasia legislation has been rolled out across this wide brown, sterile land.
We embrace the anti-life messages of “sustainability”. Of the “climate emergency”. Glorified eugenics. Having children is now up there with racism and homophobia. Ah, the homosexual revolution. No one having babies there.
The political class cares not a jot about excess deaths. One might be forgiven for concluding that, at best, excess deaths are not considered a problem. At worst, they are part of the plan.
So, too, the private asset management class that now runs the world (Statestreet, BlackRock, Vanguard). They have simply decided that the industrial revolution is over. Between the billionaires and the millennials, we are all screwed.
The twin forces who dictate global policymaking have bought, or perhaps actually themselves believe in, the brave new dystopia of which Aldous Huxley could only have dreamed.
A world where, as the homosexual Peter Allen once sang, lots of love is made but no one is born. And where we kill off the inconvenient-unborn, the grisly old, the sick and the inconvenient.
Whether by a manufactured bioweapon-virus, poisonous vaccines or through death-dignity-legislation. It is all of a piece.
Welcome to the 2020s.PC
