by MONICA O’SHEA – FEDERAL Health Minister Mark Butler is continuing to advocate for a global pandemic agreement, telling WHO “we can’t afford to fail”.
Speaking on behalf of Australia at the 77th World Health Assembly in Geneva, Mr Butler advocated for a way forward for the WHO Pandemic Agreement.
- Non-Labor MPs demand PM to walk away from pandemic agreement.
- WHO will persist in its attempts to expand its power unless stopped.
- Labor says WHO should “finish the job”.
This comes after the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) was unable to reach consensus on the draft text of the treaty after nine meetings.
Fourteen cross Party parliamentarians have so far voiced opposition to Australia signing up to a global pandemic treaty.
COMMITTED
Speaking in Geneva in Committee A on May 28, Mr Butler said “Australia remains fully committed to completing the WHO pandemic agreement”.
“Together we have come a very long way from where we started just two and a half years ago with a blank page and a shared ambition,” he said.
“An ambition for a set of binding commitments to prevent another pandemic and to be better prepared to respond more effectively and importantly more equitably when the next pandemic hits.”
When Australia decided to embark on this process in the height of the pandemic, they knew that it would not be easy, Mr Butler said.
“But we came together and took the decision, we even called the world together because this is a historic opportunity and a public health imperative, it is simply our responsibility.”
He noted the INB had developed into a “distinguished bureau” since its inception and praised the work of the “hard working WHO secretariat team” and negotiators putting together the draft text.
Mr Butler described the initial agreement as a significant achievement and said now they needed to agree on a path forward to “finish the job”.
In 2021, amid the COVID-19 pandemic, global leaders proposed the global treaty to advance an all-of-government and all-of-society approach to prepare for future pandemics.
WHO Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus presented a copy of the text in a report on May 27 (pdf), using highlights green, yellow and white to differentiate areas that have been agreed, and those that have not.
The text that has not been agreed to, in white, includes a provision where WHO would receive up to 20 per cent of vaccines, therapeutics and diagnostics for distribution during a pandemic emergency.
In addition, there is a provision where WHO would collaborate to establish no-fault compensation mechanisms for novel pandemic vaccines.
AGREEMENT
In a media release on May 28, WHO said that by the time the World Health Assembly ends on June 1, they aim to agree on the “timing, format and process” to conclude the pandemic agreement.
In addition, the World Health Assembly is working on amendments to the International Health Regulations 2005, which it hopes to finalise by June 1.
The regulations detail rules on vaccines, quarantine, international travel and health documents in the event of a pandemic (pdf).
For example, it states a traveller with a vaccine certificate shall not be denied entry as a consequence of a disease unless the authority has evidence the vaccination was not effective.
Among text that has been agreed to, it states no vaccine can be carried out on travellers without their consent.
However, if there is a public health risk and the traveller does not provide consent, a State party to the agreement may deny entry to that traveller.
Australia drafted a resolution for the 77th World Health Assembly, requesting the Director General to convene a special session of the World Health Assembly before the end of 2024 to consider an updated Intergovernmental Negotiating Body Draft (pdf).
Mr Butler explained that Mr Ghebreyesus had urged negotiators to use the assembly to re-engergise and recalibrate the process, adding, “that is what we intend to do”.
“That is why Australia worked with a cross-regional group over the weekend and yesterday, to table a draft decision reflecting the available options to finalise the agreement,” he said.
Mr Butler told the assembly this was an incredibly important decision that needs to be made together.
“We very much look forward to finding consensus in the next drafting group proposed by the chair, so that the path to finalise the pandemic agreement is clear,” he said.
“Now is the time to redouble our efforts to resolve the remaining challenges and deliver on this historic opportunity to achieve better health outcomes for all in responding to future pandemics and public health emergencies.
“Australia stands ready to deliver on this ambition. We cannot afford to fail.”
Several ministers from the Coalition, One Nation and United Australia Party have called on Prime Minister Anthony Albanese to walk away from the WHO pandemic agreement and changes to the international health regulations.
Alex Antic, Matt Canavan, Pauline Hanson, Malcolm Roberts, Ralph Babet, Tony Pasin, Matthew Sullivan, Luke Howarth, Barnaby Joyce, Terry Young, Russell Broadbent, Colin Boyce, David Gillespie and Llew O’Brien co-signed a letter to the PM expressing the concerns.
CONCERNS
“We have received a large volume of correspondence from Australians who are rightly concerned about the IHR amendments and the WHO Pandemic Treaty, and we share those concerns,” the group said in a letter dated May 14.
“The WHO has demonstrated throughout the COVID period that its global approach to providing recommendations to respond to actual or perceived public health emergencies consistently resulted in more damage than was prevented and has caused untold losses both economically and socially.”
The letter expresses that international health regulation amendments and the WHO pandemic treaty would transform the WHO from an advisory organisation to a supernational health authority dictating how governments respond to emergencies which the WHO itself declares.
One Nation Senator Malcolm Roberts said on May 29 that Mr Butler was in Geneva “campaigning for mandatory regulations”.
He said he was confident that the pandemic treaty will “not come to a vote”. However, he said this did not mean it was defeated forever.
“The WHO will persist in their attempts to expand their power unless we stop them,” he said.PC
VERY DISTURBING – PLEASE READ AND SHARE EVERYWHERE !
From the Australian Medical Professionals’ Society (AMPS) – Senate Community Affairs References Committee Inquiry into Excess Mortality
17 May 2024
We are writing to provide an important update regarding our recent efforts to present a comprehensive submission to the Senate Committee.
Despite our team’s diligent efforts, dedication, and expertise, our full submission was denied by the Senate Excess Mortality Committee. At the committee’s request, AMPS provided a summary of our full submission, along with individual submissions, for consideration. This work, undertaken by a multidisciplinary team of medical, scientific, and academic subject matter experts, required hundreds of hours of research, review, and analysis. We believe the compiled information is critically important for the committee to consider on behalf of the Australian people.
We were very disappointed that a committee of elected servants of the people denied due consideration given the depth of knowledge, experience, and time invested in the creation of these submissions. Our primary goal has always been to seek the best interests of health and safety for Australians.
The excess deaths in Australia, at rates not seen outside of wartime, is perhaps the most concerning and pressing issue facing our country. It should be of the highest priority for governments whose primary responsibility is to protect their populations. The committee’s refusal to read such a comprehensive submission and their claim that we did not answer the terms of reference directly is deeply troubling, especially considering one of the terms of reference specifically states “(d) any other related matter.” Our responses were directly linked to the TOR, as evidenced in our submission, which is now published on our website.
Being called to testify at the public hearings only to have our submission denied publication is very concerning.
We believe this decision undermines the critical importance of the issues raised and the extensive work put into our submission.
We encourage all members and supporters to read the full submission, now available on our website.
Your awareness and support in spreading this information are crucial as we continue to advocate the health and safety of all Australians.
Thank you for your continued support and your commitment to these vital issues.
Click here to read the full submission > https://8630368.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/8630368/AMPS/AMPS%20Excess%20Mortality%20Inquiry%20Submission.pdf
You can watch Dr Neil, Dr Kunadhasan and Dr Madry at the Excess Mortality hearing on 13 June in the recording here from 14:14:30. > Looks allegedly like the Parliament of Australia have disabled that page (which I have reported to AMPS) >
Warm regards,
Kara Thomas
Secretary
AMPS – Australian Medical Professionals’ Society
P: (07) 3497 5048 | hotline@amps.asn.au | http://www.amps.asn.au
Senate Community Affairs References Committee Inquiry into Excess Mortality
17 May 2024
https://8630368.fs1.hubspotusercontent-na1.net/hubfs/8630368/AMPS/AMPS%20Excess%20Mortality%20Inquiry%20Submission.pdf
AMPS WEBSITE >
https://amps.redunion.com.au/
Before the WHO finish the job, we will finish Labor.
It appears the vote has been postponed, and Tedros is meantime going full ‘punch anti-vaxxers in the face’.
https://www.independentsentinel.com/tedros-demands-aggression-against-anti-vaxxers-treatys-alive/