IF PRIME Minister Scott Morrison wants any chance of surviving next year’s federal election he must prohibit his MPs from ever again uttering the words climate, renewables and net-zero.
These are tenth order concerns for the vast majority of voters who now rightly interpret their meaning as job losses, industry closures and unaffordable power prices.
- If his intention is to rule out carbon emissions targets he should show voters the courtesy of saying so plainly & directly.
- Better still, he should implement policies that return power prices to where they were before politicians began micro-managing our energy.
They are words not in the everyday vocabulary of the PM’s quiet Australians who have deserted the Liberal Party in such numbers that his re-election now looks almost impossible.
Instead, they are the buzz words of inner city café dwellers, low-rating media outlets and pompous bureaucrats who increasing show disdain for mainstream voters and their values.
SHIFTY
The prime minister might also consider speaking straight-up with voters and stop the word-plays, shifty phrasing and double speak.
Quiet Australians are increasingly suspicious that what he says is not necessary what he means when he uses open ended statements about targets and percentages.
If his intention is to rule out carbon emissions targets he should show voters the courtesy of saying so plainly, directly and by avoiding any hint of double speak.
Confusing his supporters is driving them away.
Especially in NSW, Victoria and WA, where the prime minister is on track to lose up to 10 federal seats.
This is not surprising considering these States have become the stomping ground of some of the most Left-wing climate radicals ever to have foxed their way into the Liberal Party
Think WA’s Zac Kirkup, NSW Environment Minister Matt Kean, NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian and federal backbenchers Jason Falinski and Dave Sharma.
TRAILING
According to the latest Newspoll the federal government is trailing 48-52 in NSW, 46-54 in WA and a whopping 42-58 in Victoria’s two-Party polling.
To add insult to injury, the United Australia Party is well on its way to outstripping Liberal Party membership. And they barely, if ever, bother mentioning climate. They are more interested in prosperity and individual freedom.
Either new UAP Leader Craig Kelly has properly grasped the opinion polls or just instinctively understands the centre-Right electorate better than the current crop of struggling Liberal MPs.
According to a JWS opinion poll conducted immediately after last year’s Queensland election, 95 per cent of centre-Left voters couldn’t care less about climate issues, ranking jobs, affordable energy and health as far more important.
Among centre-right voters – who traditionally support the Liberal National Party – the divide is even greater with only two in a hundred rating climate change as an election issue.
The survey is a wake-up call to extremist politicians pushing their pet causes while becoming prey to cashed-up renewables investors who rely on tax-payer funded subsidies.
Centre-Right voters similarly ranked climate change dead last with their most important issues being the economy, jobs, living costs followed by border security, COVID-19 measures and healthcare.
Only Greens’ voters ranked climate change as important, with almost 60 per cent of its tiny inner-city voter base saying it was the most important issue they faced.
WA’s then Liberal leader Zac Kirkup ignored this reality and all but destroyed the WA division of the Party, which now holds just two of that State’s 59 lower house seats.PC
How can we trust Scott Morrison once he returns home & then he & Angus Taylor start adding whatever they signed up to without telling us?
How come he was able to put a $ sign to Labor’s zero emissions before last election YET now he will not provide a costing for what he is now sprouting? Shifty & untrustworthy in my opinion.
At his very first prime ministerial press conference, Scott Morrison was asked if he would take Australia out of the Paris Agreement.
His answer was a blunt “No”. When asked the reason, he again answered bluntly, “Security”. No further explanation was sought nor given.
This is because all Australian governments have, unannounced and without explanation or reference to the people, adopted and been implementing two legally binding conventions that came out of the United Nations Earth Summit held in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992.
These are the Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Convention on Biodiversity.
Our governments also signed us on for three “non-binding” agreements in international law: Agenda 21, the Rio Declaration , and Statement of Forest Principles.
Together their objective was to set a very, very Green course for sustainable development around the world in the 21st century. It was made graphically plain at the start by the Summit’s Secretary General, the late Maurice Strong, this would be no cakewalk for certain of us.
“It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class — involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience food, use of fossil fuels, appliances, home and workplace air-conditioning , and suburban housing — are not sustainable”, the great man said. A millionaire communist later forced to quit the UN for graft, Strong died in a grace-and-favour apartment in Beijing in 2015.
Now in year two of the WEF/UN/Corporate Stakeholders’ Great Reset we’ve begun to see and experience this prophet of doom’s vision materialising. It’s now considered safe in the hands of political, media and corporate “elites” doing the work of our Alt-government, the globalist deep state…
But only as long as we the people allow our emergency-empowered politicians to pull the wool over our eyes.
Importantly, on behalf of quiet Liberal Australians, PM Morrison should consider the following questions: –
1. Why is China pursuing net-zero in 2060 – a decade after the west lurches into economic ruin, and
2. Why are western wealthy elites, bureaucrats and politicians rushing ‘lemming-like’ to commit to net-zero by 2050 – a full decade ahead of China – the world’s single largest emitter of Co2?
…is ‘net-zero’ the precursor to an (economic) 3rd World War that China will win, funded by wealthy western elites?
For me, these are the matters that need to be addressed, PM
And we are being sold a pup by them all! As this Video shows! https://rumble.com/vmwqid-anyone-who-would-take-the-jab-after-seeing-this-is-not-worth-saving-noah.html?mref=lzerp&mc=3ifeq
Correct. It is beyond belief that, after winning the unwinnable election last time, because the alp and greens were so anti-coal that scomo still hasn’t understood that a few ratbags in the lnp and woke, greenie bureaucrats who no doubt are whispering in his and other ministers’ ears about Paris Accords, banning coal and farting livestock and promoting alarmism, do not represent the electorate.