‘Tax the men’ say feminists

by JOHN MIKKELSEN – WHO’D have thought tax could potentially be an issue for the Sex Discrimination Commissioner – or an example of women’s rights breaking an acceptable nexus between male and female? 

I know many politicians and bureaucrats struggle to define what “female” actually means these days. 

My wife received a letter from the same State Revenue department also informing her that her share of our property had exceeded the lower limit for land tax – but she was automatically exempted.
John Mikkelsen
Freelance Writer & Author

And some States only require a tick on an application form to officially change one’s gender regardless of biological block and tackle – but what could that possibly have to do with tax?

Well may you ask, but the question arose last week when I received a letter from the Queensland Treasury’s Revenue Department.

LIABLE

I was informed that, following the latest unimproved land valuation on our coastal property, I could now be liable for land tax as of June 30, 2025.

Even if it was my principal place of residence, I would have to register and submit a formal application to verify this within a relatively short time or I might be assessed on my half of the property’s value.

Wind the clock back a couple of weeks and my wife received a letter from the same department also informing her that her share of the property had exceeded the lower limit for land tax but she was exempted and didn’t have to take any further action. What?

To provide some historical context, my wife and I have jointly owned a number of investment properties in the past, these were all subject to capital gains tax based on 50 per cent of the profits and they were all sold before we moved to the beautiful Sunshine Coast 12 years ago.

We have lived here in our jointly owned home since then and have never rented the property out or used it for business purposes.

Land tax had never been on my radar so my first thought was that this could be some extra money-making scheme introduced by a Labor State Government – Wayne Goss, Peter Beattie, Anna Bligh or Anastacia Palaszczuk.

Nope, a quick search showed it was actually introduced way back in 1915.

And what a money spinner it is proving to be in modern times with rapidly increasing land values and a scale of non-indexed tax rates that kick in at a relatively low $600,000 and rise rapidly after that.

Judge for yourself from a table provided by the Queensland Revenue Office.

Whew! All that is of course on top of council rates and separate water charges.

I think a majority of properties in our local government area would now be caught in the potential tax net, with numerous owners having to declare their status or pay up.

Some house sales here in recent years have exceeded many millions, so the land value would be well up in the list and many would include absentee owners.

The Real Estate Institute of Queensland is just one organisation aware of the widening web, issuing a media release last year.

Astonishing new data from the ABS has laid bare the Queensland Government’s bumper bounty from property tax revenue over FY23, all while the State endures a housing crisis.

The data, which excludes coal royalties, shows stamp duty now accounts for 25 per cent of the tax base for the State Government compared to 20 per cent ten years ago.

Additionally, property taxes (stamp duty and land tax) have risen by 133 per cent (more than doubled) over the past 10 years, equating to an additional $4.2b per year.

REIQ CEO Antonia Mercorella said given the steep upshot in property values in the Sunshine State, it was time to reset reasonable parameters of property tax.

“Over the past five years, Queensland has recorded the highest growth in property taxes of any State,” Ms Mercorella said.

“Even with Victoria increasing taxes on property such as windfall gains tax in that period, Queensland is still taking the cake for escalating tax take.

“Despite record revenue and announcements relating to housing, it’s insulting and ironic that very little is being reinvested back into building social housing – with only 56 completed last year, the lowest on record and the lowest of any State.”

Ms Mercorella said Queensland’s property taxes may target home buyers and property investors, but make no mistake, they have a flow on impact to everyone and the economy.

“While ongoing and escalating land tax costs are inevitably partially passed on to renters in order to ensure investments still stack up and remain sustainable.

ANTIQUATED

“It’s clear our State’s antiquated property tax system is no longer fit for purpose, and this unhealthy addiction to new highs of property revenue must be tapered and kept in check.

“The REIQ continues to call for the indexation of land tax – the threshold has been set at $600,000 since 2007, so it’s well overdue to readjust the value at which land tax applies.”

All other States have similar land taxes, some (such as Victoria) may be worse, some better, with only the Northern Territory being exempt.

Meanwhile, I have filled out and submitted the required form online declaring my main residence status, so hopefully I will enjoy the same exemption as my wife.

But the reason for the contrasting treatment remains a mystery which only someone with the bureaucratic skill of Yes Minister’s Sir Humphrey Appleby could explain. But I won’t be ticking any sex-change form any time soon.PC

John Mikkelsen

John Mikkelsen is a former editor of three Queensland regional newspapers, columnist, freelance writer and author of the Amazon Books memoir, Don’t Call Me Nev
MAIN PHOTOGRAPH: REIQ CEO Antonia Mercorella. (courtesy REIQ)

3 thoughts on “‘Tax the men’ say feminists

  1. I don’t think that these days a tax liability level of $600,000 signifies wealth especially in any of the major capitals, but if that’s bad, try Victoria which has a liability level of just $50,000! Here is a list of how the taxes are applied in each state as a disincentive to investment even though Australia desperately needs more housing and rentals thanks to Labor’s Ponzi immigration scheme https://blog.longview.com.au/land-tax-of-each-australian-state

  2. John Bryant, I think John M may be expressing that “sex change” topic with a bit of TIC even though he and his wife were treated differently. His reference to Sir Humphrey and Yes Minister seems to imply it could just be a case of bureaucratic bungling rather than straight out sex discrimination, but it does pose an interesting question!

  3. Does this mean you can go & change your sex on birth certificate & get a tax dodge,wow.This from someone who can’t define male or female.

Comments are closed.