Climate ‘scientists’ admit to lying, cheating & fraud

by IAN PLIMER – ACCORDING to green activists, climate change policies don’t need to be costed because they’re a moral issue. 

Do green activists have a household budget? Whether it’s their own money or that of taxpayers, there has to be fiscal responsibility. 

Climate “scientists” operate as green activists who admit they cheat, lie, commit fraud, change measurements, make false predictions, refuse normal scientific discussion and prevent the publishing of alternative data…

The first moral issue is that climate activists ignore the evidence of the totality of integrated Earth systems and of history.

They refuse to debate, they do not analyse data, resort to fraud, do not consider the consequences of their policies and they don’t really care about the damage their policies create.


The second real moral issue is their futility trying to engineer a climate within a narrow range having no understanding of the impact to the environment to the diversity of flora and fauna and to the damage of so many Western countries.

This damage is treated as mere detritus on the path to salvation. 

Taxpayer-funded climate “scientists” operate as green activists who admit they cheat, lie, commit fraud, change measurements, make false predictions, refuse normal scientific discussion and prevent the publishing of alternative data and conclusions.

This is the seed of the whole corrupt climate change business.

Their antics are not expensive amusement but the destruction of the 2500 year-old scientific method which is one way of finding a truth.

Climate “scientists” remain unchallenged by a fawning scientifically illiterate politicised media.

For hundreds of thousands of years, humans and other organisms have adapted and flourished to great and rapid natural climate changes. Surely adaptation by an advanced technological society would be easier.

Future climate change predictions are based on computer models that have consistently failed over the past 40 years when compared with the reality of actual measurements.

The end result of changing the whole energy system based on this nonsense is an energy crisis.

During the time I was writing my book Green Murder, the coal price rose 100 per cent and LNG price 500 per cent. Don’t tell me that fossil fuels are on the path to extinction. They are needed for survival. 

The new green religion is a doomsday cult where the naïve and gullible seek salvation through the veneration of cruciform wind turbines and “settled science” that has replaced Scripture.

Fire and brimstone preachers cancel, de-platform and abuse those who question green dogma with all the savagery that was used by the Spanish inquisitors to root out heretics.

What is touted today as “progressive” is in reality a regressive drift back to the Dark Ages with its misery, poverty and ignorance.

The greens are not a soft cuddly feel-good political movement trying to make the planet a better place.

Their green propaganda appeals to many of the young and well off.

It is a communist-inspired destructive hypocritical western movement that destroys democracy and cares not for the environment.

By their actions and consequences, greens kill people. There is nothing virtuous or admirable about being green.


Today’s green religion is like the children’s game of musical chairs, a game designed to ensure that someone always misses out.

With wind and solar electricity, someone always loses. These are the people on struggle street who cannot afford to pay the increasing electricity costs, especially when they face long-term unemployment as a result of COVID-19 virus lockdowns.

It is immoral, unnecessary, futile and anti-human. 

There is a move now from European socialists, the UN and COP participants that the freedom losses experienced with COVID-19 lockdowns should be extended and that all citizens should have a climate passport where every atom of carbon used will be on a register to be monitored and taxed. This is communism. Cui bono

Net-zero is a mindless meaningless slogan. It is undefined. What exactly is net-zero? What do we use? What don’t we use? Where is the due diligence?

If it means no fossil fuel use then we go back 200 hundred years. We’ve been there. Endless mud, dung, shortened lives, disease, no heating, no cooling, nothing of the modern world and no hope.

Some EU leaders are telling us that under net-zero we will own nothing and be happy. I call this communist slavery. We’ve been there before and it all failed at great cost.

Net-zero has no costings and you can bet your bottom dollar, because that’s all you’ll have left, that your money will make the green billionaires even wealthier.

Net-zero is a cooked-up recipe for economic and social chaos, class division and further destruction of the west and its values.


The collapse in the values of Western civilisation is a far greater threat than climate change or China.

There is no need for a Chinese invasion or war, we are destroying and enslaving ourselves from within.

In just one year, parts of the West have collapsed into an energy crisis of their own making. This is a window into net-zero. 

If such facts offend you, so be it. Take a daily teaspoon of cement to harden up, broaden your knowledge, reduce your biases and challenge your thinking.

My book Green Murder contains facts underpinned by repeatable validated evidence and the scientific method. No matter how offended you might be, feelings are not evidence.

Green activists are able to get away with murder because they are unchallenged. Certa Bonum Certamen. Don’t let them get away with it.

In this book I charge the greens with murder. They murder humans who are kept in eternal poverty without coal-fired electricity.

They support slavery and early deaths of black child miners.

They murder forests and their wildlife by clear felling for mining and wind turbines. They murder forests and wildlife with their bushfire policies.


They murder economies producing unemployment, hopelessness, collapse of communities, disrupted social cohesion and suicide.

They murder free speech and freedoms and their takeover of the education system has ended up in the murdering of the intellectual and economic future of young people.

They terrify children into mental illness with their apocalyptic death cult lies and exaggerations.

They try to divide a nation. They are hypocrites and such angry ignorant people should never touch other people’s money.

The greens are guilty of murder. The sentence is life with no parole in a cave in the bush enjoying the benefits of net-zero.PC

Ian Plimer

Professor Ian Plimer’s latest book Green Murder ( will be released by Connor Court Publishing late November 2021. Pre-publication orders are discounted and signed.

MAIN PHOTOGRAPH:  Ian Plimer. (courtesy Newcastle Herald)
RE-PUBLISHED: This article contains extracts from Green Murder – A life sentence to net zero with no parole by Ian Plimer. Re-used with permission.
POLITICOM: Net-zero ‘shysters’ seek cut of Beijing’s billions
POLITICOM: Monarchists take stick to radical Charles

17 thoughts on “Climate ‘scientists’ admit to lying, cheating & fraud

  1. Professor Ian Plimer’s website comments together with his book ‘Green Murder’ should be read by everyone who wants to know the truth about climate change. He quotes facts and is supported by many other REAL climate experts including the CO2 Coalition in the USA ( whose research on this subject is extensive and entirely factual.

  2. I have noted the article and the comments. The problem is this rubbish is taught in schools by left leaning teachers influencing our children at a very young age before their brains are fully developed.

  3. Foг latest infoгmation you havе to go to see internet and on internet І found thіs web site as a fіnest web site for newest updates.


    CO2 is Not Significant in Global Warming.

    According to James Hansen the CO2 feedback is only 0.007 W/m2 per decade, which is less energy than a bee requires to fly.

    CO2 however is a major factor in plant activity and growth. Greenhouses pump up the CO2 content to 600~1,000ppm to aid the health and growth of the plants significantly.

    The major sources of CO2 are the ocean and plant decay.

    135+ Papers Find Extremely Low CO2 Climate Sensitivity

    Hansen, one of the major proponents of AGW, one of the biggest fraudsters.

  5. I agree with all of the comments. This is the biggest load of BS the world has ever seen, and it appears to be working on the gullible global populace. The climate change alarmist’s wet dreams have been realised during these covid lockdowns as they have now seen how true fear can motivate governments on a global scale to shut everything down, which is exactly what they have been trying to achieve themselves for over 40 years now, in the name of curbing greenhouse emissions, of course. They, the climate alarmists, are just shitty that they are not in control and driving these current lockdowns, but rest assured they are planning and strategising their next moves that will result in their complete control of the future government narrative with respect to future climate-saving lockdowns (and all from their university offices, I would imagine). The difference between covid lockdowns and climate change lockdowns will be that the climate change restrictions will place us in a perpetual state of restrictions – we ain’t seen nothing yet. There is a true pandemic underway and it is climate alarmism!

    I just wanted to add the idea of groupthink that seems to be driving this madness of the progressive left, or of the communists to be more precise (see Christopher Booker’s book titled “Global Warming: A case study in groupthink” for an amazing insight of this phenomenon). They basically rely on (1) agreeing on “facts” not rooted in real scientific analyses, (2) establishing a “consensus” that deems any dissenting views to be invalid, and therefore immoral as it has worked out, and (3) defending the “consensus” stance at all costs with aggressive tactics, which includes preventing any engagement/discussions with EVERYBODY that does not accept and adopt said “consensus” views with respect to man-made climate change.

  6. Plimer is correct when he suggests scientist “mislead”, Steven Koonin proved that in his book “Unsettled” where he “re-wrote” (corrected) a large number of “facts” the IPPC scientist put before the UN.
    I find it amazing that the likes of Koonin, Steelenberg, Plimer don’t get invited to the likes of COP26 conferences but Greta does.
    Maybe i have missed the point ?

  7. Our governments have signed us up for what Professor Plimer correctly sees as communist slavery.

    But until we UNSIGN ourselves we remain prisoners of our communist/corporate fascist jailors and their minions.

    As long as we exhaust ourselves in circular debate on their politically generated battlegounds of climate and pandemics, the more we hand them their political and cultural power.

    For them, the issue is never the issue— only a Permanent State of Emergency to sustain their Permanent State of Revolution. Their game plan is the World Economic Forum’s Great Reset and the United Nations’ Agenda 2030. Ordinary Aussies should know this by now, but have been duped, deceived and betrayed into low/no awareness — doomed to walk like sheep into imminent enslavement and slaughter.

    This is a pivotal phase of a decades old asymmetrical war pursued by the God-is-dead-mob and their elitist supranational infrastructure — spearheaded by the communist-oriented United Nations and the corporate fascist World Economiic Forum.

    We the people can only win this war from the grassroots up now …

    By holding the line on all green new deals and no-jab-no-job tactics pushed by politicians, bureaucrats and the mainstream media … until they hear us loud and clear …

    And by boycotting, defunding, disendorsing and uncoupling from everything and anyone who has trashed our families, god-given freedoms, constitution, and the rule of law.

    1. Maybe there is a reason there are so many sheep (animals) in Australia; to provide the role model for the humans, who have become sheep to the globalists.

  8. Brilliant
    But if the Greens will not debate and change their stories. What can one do.?
    Big businesses and media has grabbed the agenda
    Exposing the fraud and getting people to see looks impossible

  9. The horrific damage inflicted by all this green nonsense is set out above in broad terms for all to see, so the return journey back from this absurd abyss starts with a single step. Professor Plimer will be visiting Sydney early next year to debate the green climate scientists, and the likes of the Matt Kean’s and Sharma’s and all their entourage, unless of course they’re all too gutless to front. The debate will be properly moderated to afford both sides the opportunity to present their respective viewpoints.

    If we turn the tide in Australia then we give courage to the silent majority overseas to have their voices heard above all this ridiculous green din, but supporting citizens must also play their part if they love their country. Remember that China is our sovereign threat, that this thinking and wokeism weaken us economically and morally, and how close Hitler came to winning in 1940 courtesy of the thinking of those then European and British cretins who were the then forerunners of today’s climate change brigade.

    Conflict is unattractive, but beware the alternative at your peril. The greenies and their cohorts are but another bully in a school sandpit, dressed up in denial of their thuggery.

  10. CO2 does not control climate on this planet. And even if it did, humans are only responsible for a minute part of the annual production of CO2. According to the IPCC nature produces 97% of the annual sources of CO2. The alarmists argue that nature was in balance before humans started emitting their 3% of annual flux. This is ridiculous. Nature is never in balance.

    But apart from that fact which destroys alarmism, CO2 has increased in a warming world because more CO2 is released from the ocean according to Henrys Law. That slight increase in CO2 has seen a general greening of the world according to NASA and has resulted in record agricultural output. Both of which have been of great benefit to humanity and life in general on the planet.

    Alarmists are not only wrong they hate humanity and life by opposing CO2. They should be treated as such and locked up; along with the crooks and spivs who profit from renewables.

  11. Commenting about fraud, when will the Labor Opposition Leader explain Labor’s alternative to the Government’s signed Paris Agreement emissions target for 2030 instead of complaining that target is too low?

    And admit that the Government did not sign an agreement or commit to net zero emissions by 2050, the position has been clear and repeated many times before FLOP26 in Glasgow, “an aspirational goal” for net zero emissions by 2050 subject to research and development of new technology if possible.

    Australia exceeded the Kyoto Japan Agreement emissions targets and is now on track to meet Paris Agreement target by 2030. Net zero emissions was nothing more than a Paris Conference discussion point for a time after 2030 targets. Why should Australia or any other signatory to the Paris Agreement raise the target now?

    In my opinion climate and weather are natural Earth Cycles over long and short terms, the climate change hoax and warming scare is all about politics and money. The UN wanted member nations to donate $1.3 trillion dollars a year between them all for redistribution to assist developing nations to deal with a climate hoax. Including a share to China now set to rival the US economy in the not too distant future on present trend.

    The Glasgow pressure highlighted at least one of the reasons why former Prime Minister Abbott recommended that Australia complies with the Paris Agreement target for 2030, and Prime Minister Morrison and the Government he leads did at FLOP26.

    But I would not trust Labor and their Green mates if Labor and the many former Rudd, Gillard and Rudd MPs were returned to government.

    But before following the untrustworthy left leaning media spin please check exactly what Australia did not agree to at FLOP26, and what was done without commitment, and what would have resulted in considerable damage to our economy avoided.

    It remains a problem that Labor are over weight with far left MPs and close mates Greens also receiving union donations but the Liberals and Nationals have too many left leaning LINO-NINO MPs. Both sides need weeding, most Australians are centre of the road on the political spectrum, or slightly left or right of centre.

  12. Of course they’re lying, cheating fraudsters.

    These climate ‘scientists’ are chasing their personal mother lode and ripping off their fellow citizens is part of the process.

    It’s a con job and all but child-minded idiots are aware of this.

    1. 06:43 PM ET 02/10/2015
      Economic Systems: The alarmists keep telling us their concern about global warming is all about man’s stewardship of the environment. But we know that’s not true. A United Nations official has now confirmed this.

      At a news conference last week in Brussels, Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of U.N.’s Framework Convention on Climate Change, admitted that the goal of environmental activists is not to save the world from ecological calamity but to destroy capitalism.

      “This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution,” she said.

      Referring to a new international treaty environmentalists hope will be adopted at the Paris climate change conference later this year, she added: “This is probably the most difficult task we have ever given ourselves, which is to intentionally transform the economic development model for the first time in human history.”

      The only economic model in the last 150 years that has ever worked at all is capitalism. The evidence is prima facie: From a feudal order that lasted a thousand years, produced zero growth and kept workdays long and lifespans short, the countries that have embraced free-market capitalism have enjoyed a system in which output has increased 70-fold, work days have been halved and lifespans doubled.

      Figueres is perhaps the perfect person for the job of transforming “the economic development model” because she’s really never seen it work. “If you look at Ms. Figueres’ Wikipedia page,” notes Cato economist Dan Mitchell: Making the world look at their right hand while they choke developed economies with their left.

      Investors Business Daily


Comments are closed.